Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Planning Case No. 472-97: Spots Quick Lube, Inc. <br />February 19, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />Ceniral siie can no longer accammoda�e automoiiv� sales. The site is in a s�ate of disrepair a.eid is <br />in need of e�rtexasive work. <br />In �eptefnber of 1996, I�on Ostrander and Bruce MacDonald applied for a condiiional use permifi <br />to allow for an auto repair business at this site {Planning Case No. 460-96). Th� Planning <br />Commission heard this appiication on October 9, i 996 after which the applicanis withdrew th�ir <br />request. The Pianning Commission's comments as �vell as the staffreport on this earIier case were <br />given to the present applicants to guide them in the development of their plan. <br />On January 9, 1997, I�en C1ark, represeniing $pots Quick Lube, Inc., submi�ted an application far a <br />conditional use permit to allow for minor auto repair at the Auto Central site. There are no plans <br />to structurally aiter the present building. <br />A�al�sise <br />Dimensional Requirements: <br />Mi„imum Lot Size: <br />Minimum Lot Dimensions: <br />Buildin� 5etbacks <br />o Front (facing Highway 10): <br />a Front (facing Spring Lk. Rd.) <br />° Rear (facing north): <br />� Rear (facing west): <br />Parking Lot Setbacks <br />� Front (facing Highway 10): <br />• Front (facing �pring Lk. Rd.): <br />• �t�ar (facing north}: ' <br />• Rear (facing west}: <br />Required <br />�,z,sao 5�.ft. <br />150 x 130 <br />30 feet <br />34 fe�i <br />40 feet <br />40 feet <br />30 feet <br />3 0 feet <br />2a feet <br />20 feet <br />Frovided <br />27.00O sq.ft. <br />166 x 244 <br />5 i feet <br />34 feet <br />b1.9 feet <br />74.2 feet <br />S feet <br />30 feet <br />90 feet <br />28 feet <br />Met� <br />Yes <br />�'es <br />Yes <br />Y�5 <br />i�es <br />Yes <br />No <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />WiYh the exception of the setback of the parking lot from Highway I0, all of the dimensional <br />requirem�nts have been met. Given the size of this irregularly shaped parceI and the placement of <br />the existing building upon it, meetin� all of the paridng lot setbacks may not be possible. <br />I�owever, f the Commission were to consider fhe side of the property facing Highway 10 as a <br />"side" rather than a"front", the req�aired setback would be only S feet and the site would then <br />meet all of the required setbacks. ' <br />Parking Rec�uirements' <br />1�ccord°u�� to the Zoning Cade, the required rzumber of parki�g spa�es for an automotive repair <br />facility is � plus 1 space for each �00 squar� feet af flooc area over 1,000 square feei. Given ih� <br />�l <br />