05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 • Special Meeting Page 4 suitable for higher intensity purposes and that a portion is not. She explained that any designation made to the property for the Comp Plan would remain on the land whether the theater project goes forward or not. 4 A ,,,, Mr. Jay Anthony inquired if the mixed use/lowe ntensit ' Ponds with the • area shown currently for the offices: Director N: -. 9on re hat it did. She explained that using two designations d.1"' addres. } ,>t of use*/ She added that, in terms of maintaining, an 9 here n " ssI uses and environmental quality, staff want=, de `• ate the wei1; €€... z indicate that it is an area to bepreserved. > ;§ is suggesting fffiie City take advantage of the commercial possibiliti- .i i operty with its proximity to Highway 10 by switching it from just resi tia 4.:0•:..i.:.!..,141 use. She stated that Goal No. 3 addresses.U •• • servatiosan } otection of property values. She explained th "itir"`"pit }' � � i��,techniq�€ >�iey would use in order 3c�w....,:sv ,.� �:stwv:w 46.1; to make sure the neighborhood d • s not x re Impa that would be detrimental. &, " 11100" is I wag" She went on to note thatNo. 4dressed: ompatibility with features of the natural environment, i.e.itsignatin •fhe wetla: s. GoaLN o. 5 is to ,IV ,:.A..:. k p itievelo• �,•-_ , • is not accompanied by a sufficient le; services`„ -:*ded th- .. .. . :��fs water, sewer and utilities in the s g streei -,: R.,:: ..prban type uses could be accommodated and the chef rking - : * Us would come with the development review. Vane_ wow, She:ep . ,;:. is w' become part of the Comp Plan if the amendment is ed. Sh�� :. mmanzed_theddescn ion of�istrict_N __1 which_is_outlined___ 4i t Exhibit 2 of t e re j ion which explains that this District is intended to become the City Center," al point for the community. She explained, in summary, that Atstaff has prepad a resolution which provides support for the change in the land *IS use and amen the district description and the map in a way that would AIM i:rmaccommod this development. The decision on the zoning is separate, but the '$, x" '`amendment allows enough room for the proposed development to be ,i.,,,,: Bred consistent. She informed the Commission that she thought it was � iiribrtant for them to feel comfortable with this, because whether or not the proposed development is approved, the new designation will continue to be part of the plan. She added that it is Staffs suggestion that the Planning Commission recommend this amendment for approval by the Planning Commission. •