Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 • <br /> Special Meeting Page 16 <br /> Mr. Ralph Durand, 5-D Limited, addressed the Planning Commission <br /> commenting that they have met extensively with Mr. Solar who specifically located <br /> the curbs cuts and indicated where they should be. He also assured,* Planning <br /> Commission that any traffic concerns would be addressed. e <br /> Mr. Black addressed the issue of their being unt .g to #fps station from <br /> the proposal. He pointed out that the gas sta.i;,, s therela . • e unused .< • <br /> market on Highway 10. He also addressed t:'..1'.%:environrntal c0 ind .; 'r <br /> indicated that today, with the technologytha ."i p " "'� <br /> i�v, 4 sed,�,�3e rotectir� `•"�`•• �.. and <br /> contamination far exceeds what was used int: j1e <br /> �; r� and he does ncst� �e this <br /> to be an issue. He also addressed the wetla •tssue stating that 9 of 11 <br /> cities surveyed do not even have a wetland bt req ement and that the City <br /> consultant's plan (i.e. SRF Highway 10-Area€}t stu•`':' `:•`' " <br /> �€�.`��•••.elmost as much <br /> z zCk?zazz zz:.. Z�, <br /> encroachment into the buffer as the appllr shows Olt t cc acept plan. <br /> `2Y k"< <br /> Mr. George Winiecki, 2732 Hi h., li i.: r " <br /> 99 a ' ; e. screed the Sue of environmental <br /> concerns regarding storage tan ` He in :ate4 t'. . <r <br /> �:� # >nsurance industry <br /> provides coverage for pollutio �� �"• `�'```��'`'""�`�i'`4"` <br /> eakage�i""oblem itis inexpensive for customers • <br /> with the new technology. .,:r `Y v P <br /> Chuck Durand, 5-D Li tied inf•• "r <br /> x L: the emission that State of Minnesota <br /> perio. scally taxes , to asst �` <br /> yap issues and they also have strict <br /> co: •� re ardi: `` `` :� " <br /> 9 � f tanks a <br /> COm"itss e *pressed his concern that, if another gasoline station <br /> goes i? t xisting �w Mounds View be forced to close. If so, would the <br /> City th. : ,...., <� � .� :� <br /> e < xto d al witt ti n up issues. Mr. Winiecki indicated that there are <br /> corita::;.a�.:'.21w:;`2Y;t:}2"2.y..o4:'LY iJ�:S:l� <br /> ,kjould`impose regarding clean-up and believes that clean-up is <br /> ianissue. ,,.. <br /> siiliw <br /> sodie <br /> zz . z>., <br /> 1 Chair Petersorn`ingliired if we had received any new information regarding the <br /> I N diy. Director Sheldon indicated that a wetland delineation would <br /> _;�x� wetland boun <br /> `4 have to be cab and added that the boundary that will decide whether or not the <br /> `Y K evelo n�ecan occur within a certain area is governed bythe DNR. It was her <br /> .:�,zz�� .�� P <br /> `` ~ ? �`w�:. iii that this issue be discussed at the development stage. <br /> `zvs•.`iw` a <br /> Commissioner Stevenson expressed his concern with the amount of water usage <br /> with the addition of another car wash. The applicant informed the Commission that <br /> 60 percent of the water used is recaptured. Director Sheldon indicated that they <br /> could get an opinion of the Public Works Director regarding this issue. III <br />