Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 17 <br /> Mr. Ralph Durand, 5-D Limited, addressed the Commission and summarized <br /> what they feel to be the status of this request. He indicated that at the last <br /> meeting, it was his understanding that the Commission needed the malts of the <br /> Highway 10, Area 9, study in order to make a recommendat;� q_ rega ng this <br /> request. He indicated that the Commission also r quested`}`z O ��" ormation <br /> regarding the wetland buffer and there was dis n reg-, $:.• ` •_:• - car wash. But <br /> he did not interpret it to be a contingency be - their ca.� • be differ` <br /> than other car washes. With regard to the S L. report, :` ` ha f i! firm �M1 <br /> is, that theyare proposing preciselywhat th=;< •ort i commend: £`� �7: <br /> Commissioner Stevenson responded bys=. �"R =� cificall <br /> p � � the report did r� y <br /> indicate service station and, in fact, they actin`. •`a:+ore services stations would <br /> not be an appropriate use for this site. Mr. ed that SRF Consulting <br /> indicated that the corner should be a food a;l fuee :�E• f l lse/impulse <br /> commercial use. Both Commissioners -nson aBemie disagreed <br /> L.. 'rt Wiz:}i i iz;ii <br /> with Mr. Durand's interpretation that .•1< r.:.,• ..Led use is' • e isely what the report <br /> �• store ">•• aaemle t tided to the fact that the <br /> had indicated for this comer. Coar��i <br /> proposal fails to meet a couple;Q p ants nI . {th not all of these uses <br /> :ice' ���"�`�,�`•�. <br /> could be built on the site, but �€a`combin . o n of or ree is definitely possible as <br /> • opposed to the applicant's.zpm osal t.$' includ-'•:.four uses; and that there is a <br /> need to consolidate a M 8•ints �" <br /> o Highw .'10. <br /> >N <br /> ArMr. 'urand conti •. -d }'th hiss:-,,:,0`.; . menting that they are aware of the <br /> b ,g_ , sting th- .E _ . `'s stud y' that 9 of 11 other communities do not <br /> .:....:.> .•A< uffer. . : ,$ § a ented t' are still respecting 55 percent of the <br /> ,�� :, {, Y P 9 <br /> bu .: } <br /> ':ry k. w ` ti`r:ti <br /> WAF <br /> Director; asked f :: nfication on the comment regarding additional <br /> sew/Wt` stat o eing an appropriate use for the comer. It was determined <br /> Aplihhe_list fr a" Stevenson-had-obtained-this information came from a <br /> r'� <br /> workshop where. x - from the community were asked for their opinions, and <br /> therefore, it wa o •a conclusion of the Towle Report done in conjunction with the <br /> N.,. SRF Study. <br /> �: ?<ri:•ogiztr.r. Wi i� commented on the number of restaurants located on Highway 10 and <br /> `"� llI �1$• wing Commission's willingness to add more, while they are not in favor of <br /> '••�` zd rig another gas station. He said he believes the advantages of this <br /> development far outweigh the disadvantages. <br /> Commissioner Johnston stated that his major concerns are traffic and the <br /> 110 <br /> wetland delineation. Commissioner Obert expressed that he is also concerned <br /> with possible stacking and access problems. Mr. Black again brought up SRF's <br />