My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty stated that he did not want the billboards to support the golf course noting that it 1 <br />was either the billboards or tax the citizens. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mr. Jahnke stated that maybe the City should get rid of the golf course and use the billboards as a 4 <br />revenue source for the City. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty stated that this is a good point noting that the City has six billboards that they are 7 <br />getting $250,000 a year, with a 4-percent inflation factor. He noted that the City is only getting 8 <br />$15,000 per billboard for the first ten years and $25,000 per billboard for the second ten years, 9 <br />which is only a pittance of the contract the City currently has. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Thomas noted to Mr. Jahnke that she does not want to cut him off adding that 12 <br />this is not the item the Council is currently discussing. She asked the Council to get back to the 13 <br />agenda item they are supposed to be discussing. 14 <br /> 15 <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that there are several typos that should be corrected. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Marty stated that he spoke with John Diedrich regarding a letter written by Vernon, a 18 <br />summary by RLK. He stated that it did address the traffic concerns in the City noting that it 19 <br />touched on the issues saying that the traffic would travel to the more main arterials. He stated 20 <br />that letters from MnDOT, also included in this report, state that the general growth for this area is 21 <br />more than what the freeway system can handle even if funding is obtained to reconstruct the 22 <br />interchange, the intersections map operates poorly if the freeway is congested. He noted that as 23 <br />he said to Mr. Diedrich if the freeways are congested people find other ways to go. He noted that 24 <br />during morning and afternoon rush hours the City does get traffic through the area. He stated 25 <br />that it was pointed out that a lot of this is a reverse-commute adding that it was also pointed out 26 <br />how many of the Medtronic employees live in the surrounding areas. He stated that they are 27 <br />talking about 2000 up to 6000 employees once it is built out and no matter how you look at it, it 28 <br />will increase the traffic on our streets. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Gunn stated that if you look at the reports the majority of the congestion is not 31 <br />from our area and it will not be that significant from having Medtronic there. She explained that 32 <br />it is from the growth that is happening in Blaine, Ham Lake, Andover and Lino Lakes. She 33 <br />stated that Blaine has a lot of new homes going in and now they have the TCAAP area to 34 <br />consider, which would add more congestion on 35W than Medtronic. She stated that they would 35 <br />not have all 6000 employees driving through the Mounds View area adding that the people who 36 <br />do that do it now. She expressed concerns stating that sometimes it is made to look a lot worse 37 <br />than what it going to be. She stated that you can’t say that 6000 employees are going to be 38 <br />driving up and down the local roads, it is not going to happen. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Member Thomas agreed that the City already has a traffic problem and will continue to 41 <br />have traffic problems noting that she would like to get as many of the cars into Mounds View as 42 <br />they can because many of these cars would stop at local businesses. She stated that the City is 43 <br />already aware of the traffic issues and must be addressed, but this is a separate problem. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.