My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:29 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Mayor Marty noted the indication that this is an exempt and non-union position, so it is a 2 <br />management position. He asked if this should be salaried and not hourly. City Administrator 3 <br />Ulrich clarified that it is a salaried position and exempt from overtime but broken down in the 4 <br />report to show the hourly rate. Currently Ms. Crane does qualify for overtime pay. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mayor Marty commented that Ms. Crane has done a great job and grown into the job. He stated 7 <br />he does not know what the City would do if she left and he believes this is well warranted. He 8 <br />advised that during his exit interview, former Finance Director Charlie Hanson stated that his 9 <br />department and all departments are understaffed but if an Assistant to the City Administrator 10 <br />could cover some duties from each department, all would be helped out. He noted that Ms. 11 <br />Crane has been doing that all along and he saw it as an excellent suggestion by Mr. Hanson. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if the old position would be phased out. City Administrator 14 <br />Ulrich stated the position would be vacated and taken off the books so it would not be filled. He 15 <br />noted it is not in the budget to be filled next year and if, in the future, it is to be filled, Council 16 <br />can look at it at that time. 17 <br /> 18 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6638 19 <br />Authorizing Assistant to the City Administrator job description and appointing that position to 20 <br />Desaree Crane. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he thinks Ms. Crane does an excellent job and he is happy to see 23 <br />her go towards this position. However, he does not support filling it using Stanton 6 to justify 24 <br />the salary of a $9,000 immediate raise and another 3% raise at the beginning of the year when 25 <br />someone is started at Step 5. He noted the Human Resources Committee, of which he is a 26 <br />member, has been looking at alternatives to Stanton 6. He does not think the Council should deal 27 <br />with Stanton 6 in the trading of new jobs. Rather, it should be followed through on the 28 <br />promotions through the steps for the existing jobs. He suggested the Human Resources 29 <br />Committee be allowed to look at other options, such as property based tax rates of comparable 30 <br />cities. He stated he thinks it is the wrong time to proceed with this. 31 <br /> 32 <br />SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Stigney. To Postpone consideration of Resolution 6638 Authorizing 33 <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Job description and appointing that position to Desaree 34 <br />Crane, until resolved by the Human Resources Committee. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Councilmember Gunn read the memorandum that indicates there is no Stanton 6 matching these 37 <br />duties and that the Human Resources Committee did review the job description and 38 <br />recommended Ms. Crane be reclassified. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he serves on the Human Resources Committee and did not make 41 <br />that statement at all. What was asked is to go out and point existing duties at this time, not 42 <br />creating a new position based on Stanton. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.