My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:06 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 1:58:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/26/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/26/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Aaron Backman, Economic Development Coordinator, and Greg Lee, Public <br />Works Director. Representing the City’s consultant, URS Inc., were Todd <br />Halunan and Greg Brown. Also in attendance were Mayor Sonterre and Council <br />Member Thomas. <br /> <br />The meeting was an open house format for the first fifteen to thirty minutes. This <br />gave people opportunity to view several displays and discuss the study <br />informally with City staff and representatives of URS Inc. At approximately 6:30 <br />p.m. a presentation was given by Todd Halunen. A question and answer session <br />followed and the meeting concluded in an open house format. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to provide interested parties with information on <br />the County Road 10 Reconstruction and Revitalization Plan and to present the final <br />draft plans. In addition, input and feedback from the general public was also <br />desired. <br /> <br />May 6, 2002 <br />Presented results of first neighborhood meeting at this Work Session. Staff <br />sought direction from City Council on how to proceed for final approval. <br /> <br />June 17, 2002 <br />A second neighborhood Meeting was held. <br /> <br />August 5, 2002 <br />At a Work Session, the project plans were discussed. Staff asked for final comments or <br />changes. Receiving no changes or revisions, Staff directed URS, the project coordinator, <br />to prepare the final plans for adoption. <br /> <br />August 26, 2002 <br />The City Council approves resolution No. 5824 adopting the County Road 10 <br />Redevelopment Project Plans as prepared by URS. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br />The next step in following through with the plan that was adopted in August of 2002, <br />is to work with Ramsey County to develop an “Implementation Plan”. This plan will <br />outline the steps necessary to make the County Road 10 Redevelopment Plan a <br />reality. <br /> <br />A staff review of the County Highway 10 corridor considerations yielded the <br />following list: <br />1. Survey road right-of-way <br />Staff recommends that this occur as soon as possible. An engineering firm <br />could be selected through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. <br /> <br />2. Develop plan for pathway/bikeway <br />Having an over all plan will made it easier to eliminate the pathway portion <br />of the plan. It will also ensure continuity throughout the corridor and <br />eliminate design problems associated with a piece – meal approach.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.