Laserfiche WebLink
The Chair of the Charter Commission also requested that some questions <br />regarding the Charter/Charter Commission be included. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Staff has included in the 2003 Budget, under Central Services of the General <br />Fund, $7,500 to do a Community Survey (Account: 100-4160-3030). <br /> <br />Staff contacted Decision Resources, Ltd. to inquire details of performing a <br />Community Survey. Decision Resources, Ltd. has submitted a project proposal <br />outlining the scope of work and associated costs of a typical survey. This has <br />The proposal would be to perform a City Needs Assessment, pose fifty (50) <br />questions to 400 random Mounds View residents, write up the analysis, and <br />present the data. The cost would be $9,800 (an additional charge of $135 would <br />be assigned for each question over 50). Any over run of the budgeted amount <br />could be derived from a separate account. One possible account would be the <br />Park Dedication Fund, or the Wastewater Utility. <br /> <br />Staff also contacted the University of Minnesota Research Center to conduct a <br />similar telephone survey. The cost quoted was $17,500. <br /> <br />If approved, staff and the City Council could use this survey data to obtain a <br />better understanding of the views, values, and needs of the residents of the city. <br />This data can be utilized when considering expansion of City services. It is <br />equally, or perhaps more, valuable when Cities need to make tough budget <br />decisions on what items to cut and what programs to eliminate. Survey results <br />would be helpful for future budgets and for the development of City priorities for <br />2004 and beyond. <br /> <br />The survey could be conducted in early November or December of this year with <br />results available by the end of this year, or early next. This type of survey <br />(telephone) will provide a high response rate and reliability. The use of some <br />questions from 1988 and 1992 would allow the City to consider trends. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />Mailed or Newsletter Survey – Utilizing staff time and some temporary help <br />(perhaps student labor), the City could conduct a City-wide survey using our <br />utility billing mailing list. To mail surveys to the whole City would cost less than <br />$2000, plus the cost of data entry and analysis, could probably be accomplished <br />for less than $5000. Response rates on these type surveys are low, and <br />significant response bias makes these surveys unreliable. Data could not be <br />reliably compared to previous phone surveys. In addition to the relatively low <br />cost, advantages include the fact that nearly every household in the City would <br />have a chance to respond, it would be a plus for public relations, and big issues <br />of concern could be identified. The staff time is of concern and the administration <br />of this process would delay results an estimated 60 days. <br />