05-23-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council Page Six 0 Regular Meeting May 23 , 1994 Mayor Linke indicated that the City had met with Rice Creek Watershed District on the site to delineate a place for the creation of the ponding area. Orduno read contingency 2 , from Resolution No. 4572 which states, "The proposed Storm Water Control Plan shall be approved by both the City Consulting Engineer and the Rice Creek Watershed District. " Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7 : 49 p.m. Harrington stated that Resolution No. 4572 approves the development request subject to all contingencies attached to it. Councilmember Trude moved Resolution No. 4572 deleting contingency number 3 . Seconded by Councilmember Wuori. Mayor Linke stated that he had another amendment to the resolution regarding water issues. Linke asked that contingency number 4 state that the development agreement approval be contingent upon successful resolution of the wetland issues. Councilmember Trude asked if time was critical regarding this resolution • or could this resolution be delayed until Rice Creek Watershed determined the resolution of the wetland issue. Orduno explained that Westminster had to submit the approval from the City by June 3 to the Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency as the company receives points for each action taken regarding tax credits. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Wuori to Adopt Resolution 4572 Approving the Development Agreement Request of Westminster Corporation As Amended Orduno stated that a contingency should be added that states that the Development Agreement is approved contingent upon the successful —r&solution o -wetl-end---issu-ems-. Councilmember Trude stated that she amended the resolution to delete contingency number 3 regarding a safe crossing because it is impossible to hold the developer liable for ensuring a safe crossing of County Road I . Councilmember Wuori as liaison to the Planning Commission stated that this item came up at the Planning Commission and a sidewalk on the north side of County Road I was one of the selling points of the project was to be able to access the park from the project via sidewalk. Wuori indicated that there is no sidewalk that goes down the driveway to the road where persons could cross the road to the park. Wuori stated that the idea was to provide for a sidewalk where persons would not have to 411 walk on the driveway or road to the corner.