Minutes - 1994/10/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

411/ Mounds View City Council Page Five Regular Meeting October 10, 1994 development from their existing classifications of B-2 , Highway Business to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Harrington reported that the rezoning would allow the properties to be zoned consistently with the other properties in the Park. Harrington noted that the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this item and recommended approval. Harrington stated that the rezoning would also allow the building to be situated differently so it would fit better on the property. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Waive the Reading and Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 549 Amending Appendix A "Specific Rezonings of the Mounds View Municipal Code VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried B. Consideration of Preliminary plat, "Mounds View Business Park East, 2nd Addition, Resolution No. 4648 Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator, stated that this was part of the Everest Proposal. Harrington explained that there were four properties involved in this plat and the four properties will be combined into one lot. . Mayor Linke asked if there were any unresolved conditions added to this request. Harrington responded that the conditions attached were that the plat be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of its approval and that the park dedication fee are paid on the property and those are governed under the Subdivision Regulations, Chapter 1200 of our Code. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4648, Preliminary Plat, "Mounds View Business Park East, 2nd Addition VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays__ Motion Carried C. Consideration Regarding Public Works Boiler Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works, reported that during the annual inspection and preseason tune up of the Public Works Facility's heating system, several worn or faulty components were discovered. Ulrich explained that the boiler was red tagged at that time and must not be utilized until repairs are completed. Ulrich further reported that this boiler is the original heating unit which had been installed in 1967 and it's efficiency rating is assumed very poor. Ulrich noted that an estimate had been received from the City's HVAC service to replace the non-efficient boiler with an eighty percent efficient system for $3 , 500.