My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-07-20 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
1977-07-20 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:21:01 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:22:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-9- <br />~ <br />~ M3P (Heake-aurmeieter) to recammend to Council approval of the conaepr <br />,~"~lan Eor the Northcrest Park devaloYmant as pteeentad io the Planning <br />]ommtasian. The reasrvation the Planning Commiseion hae ie tha many <br />--curb cute th~t are f~ropobefl on County Road F1-2 and that perhape ~hey <br />could be minimized, it ie also tha Planning Commiseion's underatanding <br />ttiat rhere will bo a full public hearing nn the conoeptual pian and <br />that cons±derati.on will be given to the op4hions o£ the many residenta <br />alung County Road H-2 during the Council's deliberations.l <br />. <br />A roll vall vote was tiakana <br />Commiesion Member Foe~e - aye <br />Commlasion Memhor Blanch~r.d - aye <br />Commisaion Member Burmeieter - ayo <br />Chaizparaon Haake - aye <br />Commieaion Member Glazar - nay ' <br />Camniesion Memher Fedor - nay <br />Commisoton Membar Mackeben - aye <br />Commission Member Eepper - eye 6 ayes <br />2 naye <br />Commi.enion Member Glazer etated I~e £elt there were problems with tha <br />in+tensity of the R-0 zoning f~r the area ao4th of County Road H-2~ <br />and it wae far too intense to be immediately next to singl.e family areas. <br />Commiseicn MemhPr aurmeister atated that she agreed with Commiasion <br />Member Glazer concerning the problems of the intennltiy af ;~ie zoning. <br />^.haiLpert~on Haake staked that ahe also agreed with Commisaion Member <br />;lazer'e commente. ~ <br />Ccemmioeion ldembor Lepper asked how anything could be approvad by the <br />Planning Qommiaeion without knowing what was to l~e developed. Chair- <br />peraon Haake replied that that ie what PUD ia, a plan without a dePinite <br />d~'velopment set to takP place. <br />Councilmember Baumyartner stated that you have to etart som~where and <br />Ceammieeion Member Burme.iater etated that the idea is being approved <br />eo that tdr. Beim could gu ahead and make definite plane for the <br />developmEnt. <br />Commission Member Fedor augaested that before going too ~~ar aheaC with <br />the plana, thaE the R-~0 zoninq should be looked into. Coqncilmember <br />Baumgaztner asked whet Commisaion Member Fedor Eelt it ahauld Ue if <br />not R-0, and Commiaelon t•Sember Fedor replied it sliould ba, at the very <br />moot, R-3. <br />Commission MembPr Glazer stated r.hat the city would be in a much better <br />position if chey added lowar denaity. Commisaion Member *'edor stated <br />that if the area on H-2 dis3 end up to b:~ x-3,xoning the middle area <br />industrial wuuld be a bad idea, Commiesion Member Burmoleter polnted <br />auC tnat zoning the area R~-3 would involve more curb cute than R^D. <br />..rommisai.on Member Glazer otated tha~ he hacl H problem with R-0 in that. <br />t wae £ar too intense for a aingle family neighborhood. Howovor, he <br />~ound the rest oE the plan acceptable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.