Laserfiche WebLink
August 23, 19?8 peye 2 <br />~ fronta~e. Ne added that the rity has also recomnended improvements be put in for a <br />lot split, and Chat the owner could either put them in himself or petition for tham. <br />Chairperson Haake pointed out that since Mr. Zieg7meier does have 50~ ownership of <br />the lsnd, he could petltion for the services and while he woutd be assessed 50~, he <br />could then inciude that assessment iri the se111ng price of the 1ot. <br />Councilmemher Baumgartner questioned the sign on the property asking for fi11 for <br />the lot, Orficial Rose advis~d Mr. Ziegimeier that he must have a speclal use <br />permit before he can put clean fill in the 1ot. <br />Commission Member 6urmeister questioned how 1ow the land ts. Official Rose replled <br />that 1t is wet and probably holds water in some areas. <br />MSP (Heake-Glazer) to tab7e the subdivision for a ~naximum of six months or until <br />a petltion for street and sewer and watEr improvements is suhn~itted and approved. 6 ayes <br />Chairperson i~aake asked if hir•. Zefolmei~i~ was interested in petittoning for the <br />irnprovemen+.s. Mr. Zeiglmeier rep7led that the street and water improvements were <br />necessary for the back lot but that he was not sure if he wanted to petition for <br />them. <br />Comnission Member Burmeister stated that if Mr. Zeig7meter was not certain, he would <br />have the s1x months to make uo h1s mind. <br />f~ MINOR SUBDIVISION REpUEST OF GFORGE HALVERSON - 2908 HI6HWAY 10 <br />Official Rose reported that the appllcant has requested to subdivide a parce1 <br />fronting llighway 10 into two 1o±s; one beSn~ 76' w{,{P by 410' deep on the wpst <br />side and 343' deep on the east side, and the other being 560' deep 6y 76' wide. <br />Planni~g considerations include that thA exTstina zoning is R-4 multiple famfly, <br />and the Comprehensive Plan Land Use denoCes medium density, and proposed Lot 2 has <br />an existing single family hnme located on it. The appiicant has no definite plans <br />for Parcel N1, and Parcel N3 is also owned by the applicant anA shoutd 6e required <br />to b~ inc7ude6 with any plan for develupment, or subdivision. <br />Officiai Rose stated that Parcel ;/2 meets area requirements for its present use <br />but has a substandard Frontage of 76', with 85' heing required, and Parcel N1, <br />undeveloped, meets area requirements for R-4, while its 76' wldth is less than the <br />100' requ~red. Sewer is availabte on the Highway 10 frontage, whtle watar is not, <br />~nd provides only partiat service to Parcel #2. Parcel N1, as proposed, would be <br />without street, sewer and water services, and a 30' road easement for th~ extension <br />of Knollwo~d Drive north is existing but unimproved. Official Rose added that <br />services, when planned for, should include the total of the undeveloped area <br />fronting Highway 10, and that Section 42.09, Sub. 6(1) requires ti~at atl lots of <br />a subdivision abut a public7y dedicated street, and Lnt 1 does not abut a dedicatn9 <br />streat. <br />Mr. Halverson stated that he has a potenc;ai buyer for the house on Parcel p2. <br />"'~ He added that he is not sure what they wi17 be doing with the remaining land but <br />'~~ tfiey are interested in puttina in a dental lab and clinic. He added that he has <br />studie~ the Cqmprehensive Plan and feels that the property would 6e beet utilized <br />as comnercial property. <br />