1978-09-13 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

September 13, 1978 ~ Chairperson Naake asked how many homes there were alreedy along f,aunty Raad I. Orficiat Rose repiied that there are three that actunlly front County Road I and athers that back up to it. Comnission Mem6er Foss stated that he felt this wauld be a good use for Che land, with the higher denslty across Che street and the heavy tr~affic on I. Page 2 MSP (Haake-foss) to recommend to the Council approval of the rezoning of the pro- perty at approximaLely 2615 County Road i from R-1 to R-2 for a doubie ~uhgeiow development, as presented toni~ht. The Planning Commission also grauts a 2' variance for a front yard setback of 28 , raCher than that indicated on the plan, which re- quired the variance in the rear yard, because the extra footage is more needed in the back for a Luffer from the R-1 zoning and privacy. A development agreement shall atso be entered into with the dc~~etoper and City. 5 ayes MINOR SI)BDIVISION R~UESt OF ORVAL W, AUAIR - 6900 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE Offictal Rose reported that the appticant has requested approval of a minor subdivi- sion creating two lots, the interior lot to be approximate7y 153' wide by 103' deep and tha corner 7ot to be 146' wide by 100' deep. Upon approval, the appiicant'plans to have the interior lot developed For a single famity dwelling. Planning considerations include that the existing zoning and land ~,e map depicts the pruperty as R-1, and the area has ueen developed R-1 and the applicant plans to continue that usage. Both lots exceed or equai area nnd fr•crtage requirements for interior and corner 7ots. The Aast lot has an existing single family home and detached garage, both of which rtteet minimum setback ~^equirements, and the west loi has both a shed and a garaye ~hich do nat meet minimum setback requirements and should be removed prior to approval of deeds if the subdivision ie granted. Offlcial Rose reported that the west lot will require e,eryices ko be brought from Pleasant View Orive by the ~wner, and an easement will be rpquired along the south 10' of the east 1ot for the conveyance of the services for the west 1ot. Drainage wi11 be directed to the stree~ and rear of the lot in a westerly direction. Official Rose recommended that the request be approved with grantinq of the south 10' utility easement on the east 1ot for the west lot, and that the shed and garage be rertroved prior to approval of deeds of covenance or before one year or the completion af the house and garage, whichever comes first. Mr. Adair stated that there is aiready a sewer stub for Che west 1ot. Comnission Mem6er Foss asked what the City would be doing in the future if some of the preperty owners to the north wcu7d want to develop the backs of their lots, and asked if a 30' eas-:ment would be taken for a,possible future road. Official Rose replled that the City had already had an infor~natior.al public hearing for the exten- sion of Piaasant View between Woodcrest and CouqCy Road H2, and that there had not been much interest expressed in putting the road'~through. He added thaC the City of fridley does r~ut plan on putiing a road through where they border with Mounds View, and without their aid, Mounds View would most likely.not put it Chrough elther. He ~, ~ also nJded thaC the bordering property 1; owned by Onrp end is irdustrial and they "/ are rot interested in putting the road through. Chairperson Naake asked Mr. Adair whaz he planned to do on the removal of the garaye