Laserfiche WebLink
rigr~n ia, 1979 <br />Page : <br />~ locakad at the corner ~f £dgawood and Gouney Aoad L. Mr. Birch outlinpd <br />the Planning Commiesion how ha would li.ke ta daveiop the lot. <br />Off.icial Roee raco~mnendad that the Planning Commieeiou fir~t discues the <br />density and zoning, and that th6 drainage would be diacueaed and eny <br />probleme eolved baiore the dnvelopmsnt ~rae approved, <br />Commissiott Member Fedor etated he did not feel the faur plex ehould be <br />allowed sa the zoning chenge would open up the whole area ta townhouees, <br />and thet townhouses have been deni.ed in that area in the past. He sddad <br />thet the raet of L•he aren waa R-1, <br />Official Rose drew a sketch of the area an3 ehowed the present zonings, <br />Commiesion Membat Quan state3 he could not approve Che pl.an ~with the amount <br />oE impervious surface. <br />Cozumieeion Member Goebel questioned ehe square foota~a requi.r.ementa f.ax <br />a townhouse or Eour ~lex. Mr. Birch replied that if the Planning Gou~i.esion <br />did not feel a:our nlex was wrorkab2e, he would 1•lke them to coneider <br />rezoning Eor a duplex. <br />Chairperson Haake polled the Commission to see if they approved a four plex. <br />The 3ecision was unanimous witii all membere stating they were againet a <br />four p1ex. <br />.-.` <br />~ ;. Birch asked the Planning Co~iseion to conaider his original plan for <br />`~ci' duplex. <br />OfEicial Rose revl,zwed ehat plan and Chairperaon Haake again polled the <br />Commi.sef.on for their opi.nion. <br />Cou~iesion Member Blanchard stated that ahe Eelt the R-2 zoning would fit <br />into the area. <br />Commission Member Burmeister atated she had no problem with the rcezoning <br />but that she di3 see a problem with the curb cuts and recommended they be <br />brought out tu Edgewood when Che etreet was put in. <br />Commiasion Member Glazer atai:ed he had a pr.oblem with the R-2 zoning and ' <br />that ~uet because there was alzeady R-2 in the area did noC meen that ~ <br />everything should be changed to R-Z. He added that he would like to see <br />the lot remain at R-1. <br />~ <br />Commission Member Fedor staeed Chat he was concerned i~ the mittimum square { <br />fooeage requiraments would be met with the propoaed building plan and stated <br />that he would pref~r seeing 3t stay R-1. <br />Commi.asion Member Freemore ataCed that he did not have a problem with the <br />R-2 zoning, <br />, mmieaion Member Goebel etated thaC he would prefer seeing the land etay <br />,) R•-1, and pointed out thar. there would be .a problem with increased <br />~Eiaffic nnCO County Road I. Ne also pointed out thnt ehe aran in back oE <br />tha lot is R-1. <br />