1979-03-14 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 14, 1979 Page 3 ~~ T,~adtng, 5049 Long View Drive asked how the five year etorm aewer tormination wae made. Official Roee replied chat it waa 3etermincd irom the Baniskar, Short, Ellioet and Handrickeon report, from Map ~k2 of the exieting eystem, Warren Harold, 7730 Greenwood seated that he did not feel anymore dxainage was needad towurd County Road I. Commiesion Membsr Goebel pointed out that the pr.opoeed structure ia not any dif£erent in eize from a eingle family home and atated thaC tha diacuaeion wae concerning rezoning from R-1 Co R-2, Chairpereott Haake added that the drainage iseu~e would be addreeatd leter. Chairperson Haake stated that she felt the R-2 development would not er~cr~ach on the R-1 homea end painted out that tE~ere were already aeveral R-2 zoninga in the immediate neighborhood. She added that it would provide a good bufEer, Peg Mountain, 8287 Red Oak Dri.ve atated that she felt the R-2 zoning would provtde a tifce transition fr.om the R-1. She ad9ed that in the futuxe, people will be looking aC more common walls as an anergy cdnservation feature MS (Glazer-Fador) to recommend to the Council that requesL• of Jamea C. Birclt ta rezone the property at from R-1 to R-2, Che reason being that there hae no ed to do it or that building an R-1 house on that ~saleable. they deny the rezoning 2415 County Road I been a demonetrated ~roperty would be /~ aye~+ 4 neys t4SD (Surmeieter-Blanchard) to recuimnencl to the Council approval o£ the rezoning from R-1 to R-2. However, when the time comea to have the layout }resented, if Edgewaod does go through, the driveway or curb cuts must be put onto Edgewood and drainage geared to go onto future Edgewood Drive. 2 ayes 6 nays Commission Member IIlanchard stated due to increasing costs an3 keeping in mind reco~aendatione fzom the Met Couneil., multiple housing will be a wny of. life in the EuCure. Cocmniasi.on Member G~ebel pointed out that the residential area of Mounds View ia appr.oximately 90 percent deveioped already and that the coat of living has not chanbad ths~t drflsY.ically versus income. He added that he has not seen a demonetsuted need for the rezoning and pointed out that Mr. Birch kn~:w it was R-1 property. Comnisaion Membar Burmeieter pointed out that the J.ot is 147' wide, whicli ie extremely large for a eingle family nome. Commission Member Fedor replied that other R-1 Lots in the neighborhood are that large. Chairpereon Fiaake stated that she still felt R-2 wus the best zoning, naidering the netghborhood and the busy atreet. Cou¢nission Member Goebel '~ 'ated that hQ did not agre¢ that it would ~rovide a good buffer and `~ated that he did not f.eel the additional traffic ~aas needed on Gounty Road I. MS (Haake-Blanchard) to recommeud to the Council that they rezane the property from R-1 to R-2. 4 ayes 4 nays