Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounde View Planning Commiseion June 3, 1981 <br />Regular Meeting p8ge q <br />----__^_______________~___-__--~------"-----___-___-_--_°-_`-°---°---- <br />Mr. Winniak pointed ouL that the original plan had <br />~ oallad for e two srory building, which had basn <br />~approved, and that they w6re now propoeing a one <br />etory building. He added that puttinq in a fence, <br />in addition to the proposed screening, would add to <br />the cost. He also stated that they would try to <br />retain as muah oE the naturel plantinge as poseible. <br />Commiesiones Narran eiataQ that she was aoncerned <br />with the exit onto Highway 10, qoing to the west only, <br />Ms. Erickeon replied that two extenoive studiee had <br />been dona, which determined that it would not preaent <br />a problem, and he also pointed outi Y.haC thera would <br />be lesa traffic than with the oriqinal propo~al. <br />Chairporaon Mountin reviewed Rasolution No. 29-81, <br />regardl.ng the propoeal. <br />Commieainner Glazer read a piepared statement expres- <br />sing lengthy opposir.ion to the drive-in bank facility <br />propoeal. Although'he stated he would yo along with <br />a motion in ita favor, 1E ne,oessary to get a reaoluti~n <br />allowi;ig for a publia hcarinq an3 re=_j.3ent input on the <br />matter. <br />Commieaioner Millar asked that an item 6 be adde3 to the <br />~ reaolution, to rQAd "The 9rading plan be altesed so as <br />~~ to provide 0,46'acre feet of atarage (22,000 cubic feet) <br />with.,a combined outflow fzom tha ponding sites of 1.0 <br />cubio feet per aecond. ~fhe two ponds ahould be inter- <br />connected so that one pipe would ba the control struc- <br />ture to ~ha highway ditch, and the outlet pipe ahould <br />be rainforced concrete pipe."; as recommanded by Dan <br />Boxrud. , <br />Official nose atated that Mr, eoxrud w~s addressiny the <br />development as a whole, whereae Mr. Erickson and the <br />Rice Creek Waterahed Dietrict were addreasing it as an <br />individual development. <br />Cauneilmember Forelund asked that the reaolution be <br />ahanged on hhe 4th "Wharea~" to indicate that the City <br />had received tho plan on October 15, 1979. <br />Chairperson Mountin stated that the developer has been <br />informed that future development of the praperty will <br />require a aubdivision. Mr. Erickaon asked if a re- <br />zoninq pr~cess wae necessary for duwnzoning the property. <br />Chairporaon Mountin :aplied that the Planninq Commission <br />would like the developer to inStiate a requeaC for down- <br />zoning. official kose added that rho bankinq Eaoility <br />ia allowable in 8-'s zoning as well as in e•-2, and that <br />,' ~the developer could petition for downzoning. <br />~~Mr. Erlekeon atated that he felt he was getting negative <br />foedback from the Planning C~mmiaeion on the naw propoeal, <br /> <br />