1981-06-03 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounde Viaw Planning Commiseion June 3, 1981 Regular Maetinq page 5 °--____°--°--°----^~-___-__-'-'--------------^__--_-_-____°___________° which wae an improvement over the original one. Cha.irpereon Mountin replied that thmy would hava ~ instructed him te etart ~ver if, thoy did not fael it wae an improv9ment. Mr. Winniok aeked that it be noted that the daveloper had not requeated a rezoning, and that it was being required by the Planninq Commiseion. Chairperoon Mountin replied that it was requaeted to proteat the area, and that tlie Planning Commiesion would like it downzoned, and th~y want to ineura that a mure intense uae is prohibil•ed. Sha added rhat e publ~c haaring would be required with any rezoninq. Motion;Second: Glazer/Anderaon to accept Resolution No. 29-81, 6 ayae 0 nays Motion Carrisd Commissioner Glazer restated hia fundamental opposi- tion to the bank pr~poeal at this time, expleininq his votg ae a pragmatic etap to get wording that would facilitate a public hearing on the isaue. He falt ~hat conaeasion was necessary be~ausa a motinn to paes the resolution by the reat ~f the commission aeemed ~robable in ar.y event. ' Of'ficial Rqse presented the Staff report £or the appli- b. Wayne Herr Const. - cant's proposed 40 unit condominium development, and Co., 2908 Hwy.10 cnvered the planning coneiderationa. Development Pro- posal, Hlgh Deh- Wayne Herr, of Wayne Herr Construction Company, gavu eity Rasid~ntial a presentation of his proposal, and oxplained what a Case 89-81 home ownera asaociation does in maintaining aondominl- ums once they are built. Dou,q Dinndorf, 2901 Oakwood DrSve, asked to remind the Planning Commisaion that this was basically the same type of development that had bsen proposed before, and that the Compreheneive Plan calls for it to be single Eamily and medium deneity development. He stated he wae ~fraid tha'_ the property to the east would be developed in tho same manner, thus putting approximately 80 units in a~mall area and deyradiny property values in the neighborhood for eingle family homes. Chairperaon Mountin replied tliat they must remem- ber *he legal rights of the property owr.er to develop the property as is called for by the present zoning. ~ric Emeraon, 7865 Spring Lake Road, aeked if the City r,ou2d compensate the property ownera in a rezoninq. Offi- cial Rose replied that it wae a legal question. He added that tha Comprehaneive Plan takes tirae to implement and ~ that the Met Councii muet approve it first, He explained that the propexty could be rezona@ ei.thAr at the requeat oE the property awnare or by the request af the Planning Com- misaion to the C1ty Counail.