Laserfiche WebLink
founds View City Council June 12, 1989 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />• Mr. Olson stated they already have trucks and other <br />traffic in their area, looking for the business park. <br />on the north side, and they do-not want any more that <br />would come with development. <br />Mayor Hankner stated they had not received any phone <br />calls or any indication of concern about this issue <br />until the past week, even though it has been discussed <br />many times already. <br />Mary Paone, 5240 O'Connell Drive, asked why the road <br />extension is needed. <br />Mayor Hankner explained that in July 1980, as part of <br />the Comp Plan for the City, the extension of Woodale <br />Drive was. approved for implementation. with. any future <br />development in that area, for health and safety reasons. <br />She pointed out they had only received one complaint <br />about it as of last week, even though. it has been <br />discussed numerous times, going all the way back to <br />1980. She added she had gone back through City <br />records and prepared a listing which was available <br />to the residents, showing the numerous times this was <br />discussed, and she did not find any record of objection <br />to the extension of Woodale in any previous discussions. <br />. Norman Burrows, 5200 O'Connell Drive, stated he did not <br />know the road was proposed to go through. <br />Mayor Hankner explained an informational meeting was <br />held, articles appeared in the newspapers, and notice <br />was given, informing the residents of the meetings:. <br />She added the Council uses the Comp Plan and Zoning <br />Code to review developments, and is following the <br />guidelines of both. She pointed out this proposed <br />development has been on the Council agenda several <br />times, and the Council has been asking for comments: <br />and concerns up front, and has requested input from <br />the residents. She further pointed out the Planning <br />Commission reviewed the development using both. the <br />Comp Plan and Zoning Code. <br />William McCullough, 5269 Greenfield, asked why that <br />was adopted in 1980 when the houses have been there <br />for 20 years. <br />Mayor Hankner explained that in the 70's', the State <br />required cities to adopt a Comp Plan. She added she <br />was not personally involved in City government at that <br />time. She also pointed out th.e public hearing process <br />prior to adoption, and residents could. have voiced any <br />objections then. <br />Greg Flatten, 5229 0"Connell, asked why it took. this <br />proposed development to come along, if the City was. <br />concerned about the health. and safety in 1980. <br />