Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 1, 2008 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the lot may have been full because of the overlap of an event and <br />the park and ride. The park and ride has 43 spots in the front lot but the lot behind the Mermaid <br />could have been empty. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek asked if the park and ride was going to be eliminated. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated that neither staff nor the Planning Commission has required that the <br />park and ride be removed at this point, although the City Council could make that recommendation. <br />Staff noted that businesses would only hurt their own operations by not having sufficient parking. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the resolution before the Planning Commission tonight is for the <br />revised preliminary plat only. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Gunn/Commissioner Lang. To approve Resolution 895- <br />08, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Revised Preliminary Plat for The Mermaid, 2200 <br />County Highway 10 as Amended; Mounds View Planning Case MA2008-001 <br /> <br /> Ayes –6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated since the last meeting there was a mailing to <br />the Planning Commission with updated documents and information for the comprehensive plan. <br />He stated there were no new documents in this packet. He stated the City is waiting on the <br />transportation and public facilities chapters that are being reviewed by the City Engineering <br />consultant. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he has gone through the new plan thoroughly and asked that the page <br />numbering be similar to the numbering system of the city code. He stated he has studied the <br />maps and indicated they are great. He questioned the existing land use map and the missing <br />designation of developable residential lots. He suggested a different color or hash marks to assist <br />in designating the developable lots. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated the future land use map should remain the <br />same. He suggested creating another map and having the whole map white except for the <br />developable lots and making them a different color or hash marks. He asked if the map should <br />be just residential or both residential and commercial. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated the commercial and industrial lots are well designated on the existing <br />maps. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned the natural features on the new map compared to <br />the old map. She noticed a few of the natural resources were missing or smaller on the new map.