Laserfiche WebLink
From: <br />Sean Walther <br />To: <br />Jon Sevald <br />Subject: <br />Crossroads Pointe <br />Date: <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 9:04:06 AM <br />Hi Jon. <br />I may try to make it to the open house Wednesday for Crossroads Pointe. In case I do not, I thought <br />I'd share a few thoughts with you based on the site plan information that has been posted. Thank <br />you by the way for sharing it with residents. You have done a good job of getting the word out. I saw <br />it in multiple locations. <br />I am not excited about the gas station use. Although I have favorable experiences with the brand, it <br />seems like a step backwards for the city and that property. The city removed a gas station from this <br />site already. In my opinion when the city buys property for redevelopment, it raises the bar for <br />redevelopment to uses that are strongly desired by the community and fill an unmet need. Also, the <br />expanse of land the gas station is taking up for single -use, auto -oriented commercial purpose is <br />disappointing. It is also a use that we have plenty of along this corridor. Finally, while I can perhaps <br />see the access benefits to locating the station on the west side, it is very counterintuitive to have the <br />commercial sandwiched between the residential apartments that are proposed and low density <br />residential across the street. <br />Regarding the alternative for all apartments, I would favor that plan of the two alternatives. <br />Although, I think it is a shame to not include some commercial mixed-use on the site. I like the <br />buildings framing the major streets. I think the building is getting too massive. I'd like to see the <br />mass broken up into two or three structures. And if not three actual separate buildings, at least <br />some breaks and variation in the fagade and massing and ground level openings to capture aesthetic <br />and site pedestrian circulation benefits. I like the public road connection to the residential area to <br />the south coming off of Edgewood. I think the amount of surface parking shown on the apartment <br />site plan is absurd. I'd like to see the city pushing for more underground or surface parking, in order <br />to offer much more and higher quality outdoor amenity and recreation areas for the use of the new <br />residents, and more and higher quality landscaping for the benefit of the neighbors and public that <br />pass by. <br />You can probably see that I haven't honed my message(s), yet. I am a realist and understand the <br />market in Mounds View is not as strong as other places to achieve mixed use of this site and highly <br />desired uses. However, I think the city can also afford to patient, and can be a strong negotiator as <br />the property owner for development that really satisfies many city goals. <br />Thanks for reading my ramblings. Maybe I'll see you on Wednesday. Thanks. <br />Sean Walther, AICP <br />Planning and Zoning Supervisor I City of St. Louis Park <br />5005 Minnetonka Blvd, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 <br />Office: 952.924.2574 <br />www.stlouispark.org <br />Experience LIFE in the Pork. <br />