My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2019 PC Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-19-2019 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2019 9:41:58 AM
Creation date
10/30/2019 9:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
MINUTES
Date
6/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 05D <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />The property is guided for Mixed -Use PUD in the Comprehensive Plan (2008), and is guided as <br />Mixed -Use in the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Draft Plan identifies the residential <br />component of Mixed Use to have a density of 15 to 30 units per acre (31.53 units per acre is the <br />proposed density). <br />During the Planning Commission's June 5'h Work Session, it was asked why doesn't this project <br />include mixed-use with commercial/retail on the first floor of the building? The Developer <br />responded that the limited access does not support mixed-use. <br />Density <br />The apartments will have an estimated 221 residents.z During the Planning Commission's June <br />511 Work Session, it was asked how this will affect the school district. This is not known. It is <br />anticipated that because 75 of the 128 units will be studio and one -bedroom units, there is not <br />likely to be a large population of school aged children. <br />31.5 units per acre is the proposed density. As a PUD, a higher density may be approved. <br />Without a PUD (R-4 district), the maximum density would be 17.4 units per acre, or 71 units for <br />a property this size. <br />During the Planning Commission's June 5 t Work Session, it was commented that apartments <br />should not be concentrated along Mounds View Boulevard. Within Mounds View, large and <br />mid-sized apartments are scattered along major roadways, including Mounds View Boulevard, <br />County Road I, County Road H2, and Silver Lake Road. <br />Open Space' <br />Usable Open Space is intended to be maintained for active or passive recreation (e.g. play area <br />and/or woods). The proposed Landscape Plan identifies all non -pervious surfaces as Open <br />Space, rather than that intended for recreation. <br />Min Required Proposed PUD <br />625 sf per unit 461 sf per unit <br />With the increased density and necessary parking, there are limits to how much land is left for <br />open space. If the project were not a PUD, and the maximum 71 units built, about 1 -acre of <br />open space would be required for the 4 -acre project. <br />The project will add a sidewalk along County Road H2, and along the south property line. There <br />is an existing sidewalk along Edgewood Drive, and a trail along Mounds View Boulevard. <br />These are public sidewalks/trails, and will be maintained by the City. <br />Exterior Lighting <br />Glare from exterior lighting shall be limited to 1 foot-candle (fc) measured at the centerline of the <br />street, and 0.4 fc measured from neighboring property lines. The lighting plan submitted does <br />not include all of these boundaries (e.g. centerline of Edgewood Drive, County Road H2, and <br />residential boundaries along Edgewood Drive. <br />z Estimates based on Metropolitan Council estimates for persons per household, for multi -family dwellings, based <br />on number of bedrooms per unit. <br />3 City Code, Section 1102.02, Subd 127 (Usable Open Space) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.