Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission requested staff to write a <br />resolution including these points: <br />The playfield is still a speculative <br />concept. <br />- The playfield development costs are <br />speculative. <br />The city, as a partner to a plan that <br />does not have a cost. <br />Since the city is mostly interested in <br />soccer fields, offer an amount that <br />typically would cover development <br />costs. <br />Explain how the cities' interests are in <br />the plan. <br />Explain who would most likely receive <br />user fees. <br />In-kind services are as important and <br />may possibly be of value in lieu of <br />monetary contribution. <br />MW <br />The Commission recommended that monies <br />allocated for a bridge at the Silver View Park <br />pond narrows be removed. The Cor:unussiOn <br />requested staff to write a resolution stating <br />these reasons: <br />- Higher traffic. <br />People may jump off. <br />People may throw trash and litter into <br />pond. <br />It costs a lot of money. <br />A pathway offers an avenue around the <br />pond at a lesser cost. <br />- A bridge encourages "short cut" use <br />rather than exercise. <br />- Money could be better spent. <br />- A bridge ruins the natural aesthetics of <br />the pond. <br />- A bridge may alter geese landing <br />patterns. <br />- A bridge breaks up the continuity look <br />or appearance of the pond. <br />