Laserfiche WebLink
r) <br />SILVER VIEW PARK TASK FORCE <br />2ND MEETING <br />APRIL 4, 1990 <br />QUESTIONS FOR DISCISSION <br />1. What other alternatives are there for the amphitheater? (i.e. re -terrace, let <br />grow, develop into a sliding, rock climbing area, fill in. <br />2. What should the buffer zone distance be from the pond? <br />3. Who is to determine when it would be beneficial to the pond to perform weed <br />harvesting. <br />4. The recommendations from this group regarding Silver View Park improvements <br />are dependent upon funding just as the 1981 Master Plan was dependent upon <br />funding. What will be the answer to community residents asking why <br />scheduled improvements are not occurring if monies are not appropriated as <br />recommended. <br />5. How can this improvement plan remain flexible for special opportunities or <br />needs which today are unforeseen such as grant opportunities, special <br />donations, requests for special facilities. <br />6. The issue of pathway construction materials must be decided, asphalt or <br />woodchip or combination. Is the group interested in the northern asphalt <br />pathway addition and if so, what is the priority? <br />7. Donations will probably provide the greatest funding for the majority of the <br />improvements. This group must review the "receipt of donations" issue to <br />ensure that donations will be generously given and received to encourage an <br />atmosphere of good will by donating organizations and the City. <br />63 <br />