Laserfiche WebLink
Pulte Infill/Redevelopment Experience <br />One of Pulte's primary focuses is on infill/redevelopment. We have partnered with many cities <br />throughout the years to successfully complete infill/redevelopment sites throughout the Twin <br />Cities. We recognize that when developing an infill property there are additional considerations <br />that must be considered and addressed. Typically, these include focusing on the various goals <br />of a city and being sensitive to the neighbors. We have gained experience and skill in these <br />areas. <br />In recent years, we have completed infill/redevelopments projects in the nearby communities of <br />New Brighton (2), Fridley, and others. Please see the project bios at the end of this submittal for <br />details on some of these infill developments/redevelopments. <br />Site Plans <br />The process of creating a site plan involves balancing many forces. These forces typically <br />pertain to physical constraints, the housing market, City goals, and sensitivity to the neighbors. <br />We take pride in carefully contemplating the various forces to find a balanced and logical site <br />plan. <br />We evaluated the Greenfield site and concluded that the physical constraints were too great to <br />resolve. The extent of the floodplain left little land to develop. <br />We turned our focus to the Ardan Avenue property. Below you will find a description of the <br />example site plans submitted for review. At this early stage, they are conceptual in nature and <br />are certain to change as new information comes forward. <br />We created three different site plans for us to better understand what could occur on the site. <br />Concept 1 includes only those properties that area currently owned by the City. This proved to <br />us that a workable redevelopment project could occur without the acquisition of any additional <br />properties. Concept 2 is a highly sensitive site plan which assumes the acquisition of some <br />adjacent properties and retains extraordinary wooded buffers to some of the adjacent <br />properties. Concept 3 is what we would consider to be the maximum use of the City land and <br />adjacent properties. <br />Concept 1 <br />The underlying assumption with this site plan (concept) is that only City properties would be <br />developed. This could be the result of the City wanting the redevelopment to be limited in scope <br />or it could be the result of neighboring property owners not being interested in selling their <br />properties. The site plan shows two story townhomes (see a later section in this narrative for <br />more details on the housing). <br />In general, the layout of this site plan is functional and practical. We haven't taken this site plan <br />to the next level in detail dealing with guest parking, potential amenities, etc. <br />Typically, townhomes have private streets and public utilities. In this scenario, the streets <br />serving the townhomes would need to be public to enable the existing platted lots to be served <br />by a public street. Since these existing lots generally do not have sewer, water, or street access, <br />they would be assessed their share of the public infrastructure costs. <br />0) <br />