My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/25/82 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
03/25/82 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 1:50:03 PM
Creation date
4/21/2023 1:13:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
— <br /> 111/1 MEMO TO: Community Education Advisory Council <br /> FROM: Community Education Advisory Council Task Force <br /> RE: Closed Schools: Impact on Community Usage <br /> PURPOSE <br /> The School Board of Independent School District #621 voted to formally close <br /> two elementary schools and two junior high schools effective June, 1982. Their <br /> decision was necessitated by declining enrollments and revenues , and was made after <br /> a complex evaluation and review involving all School District facilities. <br /> The closings of the four school buildings will have profound impact on the entire <br /> School District and the municipalities which comprise the School District. The <br /> purpose of this study is to examine that impact primarily from a program perspective <br /> and to provide possible alternative solutions to either minimize or offset this <br /> impact. It should be noted that the major emphasis of this paper is on secondary <br /> 111/1 <br /> school facilities and the closings of Edgewood and Johanna Junior High Schools. <br /> EVALUATION PROCESS <br /> The evaluation process used in reviewing the feasibility of alternative school <br /> use was broken down into four major categories: <br /> I . What is the current facility usage of the gymnasium spaces at <br /> the secondary school buildings. <br /> II . Operation and maintenance costs as they relate to proposed <br /> "mothballing" costs. <br /> III . Surrounding school district experiences. <br /> IV. Immediate impact on school district and municipalities. <br /> In addition to the aforementioned process we explored several alternatives as to <br /> what uses the building could be put after it's closing. These alternatives were <br /> generated from staff, surrounding communities and the Educational Facilities <br /> 11111 Laboratory; a national organization which has published several studies on the <br /> recycling of school facilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.