Laserfiche WebLink
/)MEMO T0: Mounds View Parks and R: eation Commission <br /> 1111 FROM: Bruce K. Anderson ��, c' <br /> Parks, Recrea ion or' • o4 - ry 64 \ <br /> :;ert) <br /> DATE: May20, 1986 �1� ` 017) <br /> 1 <br /> RE: Herbst Sub-division 19 <br /> Commissioner Silvis requested staff to provide a breakdown of <br /> possible projects for the use of the $39 , 000 from the Herbst sub- <br /> division at the May 1 Commission meeting. Staff ' s reactionwould <br /> be threefold: <br /> 1 . To develop a policy for park dedication monies , whereby 75 <br /> percent would be allocated to long range projects, or a large <br /> capital improvement fund , with the remaining 25 percent to be <br /> utilized for immediate project development. By adopting some <br /> type of a policy such as this, we would be working towards <br /> our long range goal of reaching a $500 , 000 capital improve- <br /> ment fund whereby we could " live" off the interest for future <br /> park rehabilitation projects and still meet some of our short <br /> range goals. <br /> E) 2. The number one park project that has been delayed for two <br /> years running is construction of two lit tennis courts at <br /> Groveland Park. I feel this project deserves consideration, <br /> as the Groveland Park Foundation has been working long and <br /> • hard hours to improve their park site ; this would provide a <br /> fitting culmination of their efforts over the past four <br /> years. <br /> 3. The third priority that I feel is important would be the pav- <br /> ing of the Silver View Park parking lot. The parking lot at <br /> Silver View Park is currently experiencing a high level of <br /> vandalism due to the easy access to the general park area. <br /> By paving the parking lot, we would not only enhance the site <br /> and improve drainage , but also reduce the existing vandalism <br /> problems. <br /> Staff also feels that once the Commission completes the work <br /> sheets and prioritizing the capital improvement projects as for- <br /> warded by staff , the Commission may have a higher priority pro- <br /> ject than the three suggested by staff . Staff looks forward to <br /> your discussion and input on this issue . <br /> BKA/sll <br /> 410 <br />