Laserfiche WebLink
• Delineation of sub -watershed boundaries and land use determinations for each lake studied <br />• Listing of current impairments for the 24 lakes studied <br />• Summary of available lake quality data <br />• Recommendations for additional lake quality monitoring via the Metropolitan Council's Citizen <br />Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP) <br />• Identification of available in -lake and watershed BMPs to address impairments of the lakes <br />studied <br />The report identified Spring Lake as a shallow basin due to a littoral area that encompasses more than <br />95% of the lake. The existing lake quality data for Spring Lake was limited, with only one full year of <br />sampling data available at the time the report was written. The report recommended that Spring Lake be <br />added to the CAMP in 2008 to begin to compile additional lake quality data. The report also notes that <br />Spring Lake has experienced significant water level fluctuations in the recent past. New data could <br />provide insight into the level of impact the water level fluctuations are having on lake quality. <br />Phase II of the report focused on soliciting input from lake stakeholders to identify any "impairments" to <br />the beneficial uses they identified. This phase used the existing lake quality data and identified <br />impairments to develop MAPS for each of the 24 lakes studied. The MAPS included a discussion of water <br />quality, public input, and recommendations regarding data collection and specific BMPs to address <br />impairments. <br />4.4 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SUIP) <br />As identified in the City's 2008-2009 Action Plan, the City implemented the Street and Utility <br />Improvement Program (SUIP). The basis for this program followed the recommendations of the Streets <br />and Utilities Task Force: <br />Reconstructed or rehabilitated all streets within 9 years. <br />No assessments to individual property owners. The City financed the SUIP in part by a tax levy on all <br />properties. <br />Adopted a uniform street standard making engineering of individual projects straightforward. <br />Recommended standards included: <br />o Structurally strong street section with durable concrete barrier -style curbs. <br />o Repaired and upgraded water mains and sewers. <br />o Considered sidewalks or trailways where indicated in the City's Comprehensive <br />Sidewalk/Trailway Plan. <br />o Applied the most cost-effective stormwater management practices to comply with RCWD <br />Rules; this generally meant rain gardens or infiltration swales. <br />o Group mailboxes in accordance with Municipal Code. Significant flexibility to <br />accommodate individual property owners needs remained. <br />Information about the SUIP can be found on the City's website. <br />4.5 STORMWATER INFILTRATION PROGRAM (SIP) <br />To address the RCWD volume control requirements for the SUIP areas, the City implemented a program <br />that approached volume control for all projects in a uniform and cost-effective manner. The City Council <br />adopted a resolution establishing the Stormwater Infiltration Program (SIP) to provide a uniform and <br />City of Mounds View 21 <br />Local Surface Water Management Plan Stantec Project No. 193804166 <br />5 5tantec <br />