Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 13, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />H. Resolution 7717, Relating to Issuance of the City’s MultifamilyHousing1 <br />Revenue Bonds (Select Senior Living of Mounds View Project), Series20102 <br />as Temporary Bonds and Authorizing the Issuance of MultifamilyHousing3 <br />Revenue Refunding Bonds (Select Senior Living of Mounds View Project), 4 <br />Series 2011 and the Execution of Various Related Documents. 5 <br />6 <br />Finance Director Beer explained the Council began the bonding process with SelectSenior7 <br />Living in July by passing Resolution 7672 which authorized the issuance of housingrevenue8 <br />bonds. At this time, Select Senior Living was requesting temporary bonds which wouldallow9 <br />the market place to clear the over abundance of revenue bonds. Staff recommended approvalof10 <br />the resolution as submitted. 11 <br />12 <br />Scott McLendan, Oppenheimer, explained Select Senior Living was facing several concernswith13 <br />the timing of this bond issuance. The market was flooded with housing revenue bonds atthis14 <br />time due to the Build America Program. These excess bonds have created a glut in themarket15 <br />which needed to clear before a favorable bond rate could be guaranteed. The temporaryissuance16 <br />of the $14 million in bonds was a positive option for the developer to continue with the project. 17 <br />He indicated the bonds would then be refunded at a more favorable rate in the near future. Mr. 18 <br />McLendan further reviewed bond market specifications with the Council. 19 <br />20 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned if the stock market had any bearing on the bond rating. Mr. 21 <br />McLendan stated the stock market had no effect on the bond rating but when there wasmore22 <br />confidence on the stock market, funds moved from bonds to stocks. 23 <br />24 <br />Council Member Mueller asked what impact an extension of the Build America bondswould25 <br />have on the proposed housing revenue bonds. Mr. McLendan indicated he did not anticipatean26 <br />extension of the program. However, there was always a chance and if extended moreissuers27 <br />would be moving to the bond market during third and fourth quarter of 2011. 28 <br />29 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned if the City was at any additional risk by issuingtemporary30 <br />bonds that would then need to be refunded in the future. Mr. McLendan stated there wasno31 <br />more risk than the original request to issue bonds as Mounds View was acting as the conduitand32 <br />was not fiduciarily responsible for these bonds. Jenny Bolton, Kennedy & Graven, agreedthere33 <br />was no difference in this bond issuance as the borrower was responsible for the paymentson34 <br />these bonds. 35 <br />36 <br />Council Member Hull asked why the request was before the Council and if the project wasstill37 <br />on schedule. Joe Larson, Select Senior Living developer, explained the bond allocation wasdue38 <br />tomorrow at noon and if not completed the project would be done. 39 <br />40 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if Oppenheimer was underwriting the temporary bonds. Mr. 41 <br />McLendan stated a private purchaser was funding the entire $14 million in temporary bonds. 42 <br />43 <br />Mayor Flaherty commended Mr. Larson for working so diligently on this project. He feltthe44 <br />project would greatly benefit the City of Mounds View. 45