Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />r~ <br />1...J <br />Ayes - 5 <br />Nays - 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />I. Resolution 6951, Approving Change Order No. 3 and Authorizing the <br />Installation of Front Doors for the Random Park Building Replacement <br />Project <br />• <br />Council Member Flaherty asked for further information and an explanation on Change Order No. <br />3 at Random Park. <br />Director Lee explained the doors replacement for Council noting that there was a set of doors at <br />the rear of the building that opened into the building and a side service door that opened out of <br />the building. He then said that the question was whether to have three doors on the front of the <br />building and Staff decided it did not make sense to have the side service door not knowing that it <br />was a requirement to have that door. He further explained that for public safety reasons a door <br />that opens out of the building is necessary and this would change the doors to open out. <br />Director Lee indicated that these doors were a lower quality type of residential door so there is a <br />benefit to changing them to a commercial style steel door. <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated that this is necessary but this should have been caught and he <br />does not agree with an automatic door opener at the cost of $2,000. <br />Council Member Stigney said that he thinks that the outside consultants should have been aware <br />of this so that bothers him but this needs to be corrected. <br />Council agreed to eliminate the automatic openers. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6951, <br />Approving Change Order No. 3 and Authorizing the Installation of Front Doors for the Random <br />Park Building Replacement Project Without the Automatic Door Opener. <br />Council Member Thomas said that she thinks if a Change Order is being done it should not go on <br />the Consent Agenda. <br />Director Lee apologized and explained the reason for it being on the Consent Agenda was <br />because he was not going to be at this meeting. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if this is the same architect as City Hall and said that he is very <br />disappointed that this was not caught. He then said that he would like Staff to send out letters <br />informing them that the City is dissatisfied with their service. <br />Ayes - 5 <br />Nays - 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS <br />