My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:52:37 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-16- <br />a.) There were large industrial areas where existing industrial land could, <br />i <br />be used to buffer any nearby residential areas; <br />b.) Residential land occupied only 2 or 3 sides of an industrial area so <br />that development could take place near the non-residential side; <br />c.) Industrial areaswhich were divided from residentail areas by other <br />land uses such as cemetaries, parks, highways, natural barriers; or <br />d.) There is no residential areas near the industrial area or only scattered <br />residences near the industrial area. <br />65. Statutory requirement --Providing a buffer from major residential developments <br />reflects the local land use and land use controls of the area, as well as the <br />existing and future developmental patterns in the area which must be considered <br />pursuant to Section 115A.09. <br />66. Providing a buffer from major residential developments also reflects the <br />concern of the public that the areas be consistent with local land use. <br />67. Because incineration is often viewed as a "heavy" industry the Board <br />felt that industrial areas that had some buffer from major residential develop- <br />ments would be viewed as more acceptable by local residents. Transfer/storage <br />and chemical treatment facilities can be considered "light" industry and would not <br />require as much buffering for aesthetic purposes. <br />B. €00tidnalIGF,d•tertm <br />68. Prefer existing or planned compatible industrial development (i.e. chemical <br />related, manufacturing, plating, oil storage, etc.) was the first optional <br />criteria for chemical treatment, transfer/storage, and incineration areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.