My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:50:31 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 3:50:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/1986
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR <br />DATE.: FEBRUARY 24, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: OUTDOOR WARNING SIREN BIDS/PROPOSAL <br />As you will recall, on January 9th Gie Pity received bids <br />for the relocation of our two 110 lb. outdoor warning sirens <br />and the installation of a 124-126 db. siren. At that time <br />we received 5 proposals from 3 companies as follows: <br />1. Electric Service Co. Relocation: $ 5,492.00 <br />A.C.A. Penetrator 10 Installation: $10,850.00 <br />516,342.00 <br />2. Lehn Electric 4A. Relocation: $ 5,395.00 <br />Federal Thunderbolt Installation: S11 195.00 <br />19,8 <br />1B. Relocation: S 5,395.00 <br />Federal Thunderbeam Installation: 11,100.00 <br />$16,495.00 <br />3. Corrigan Electric #A. <br />Federal Thunderbolt <br />#B. <br />Relocation: S 4,350.00 <br />Installation: 10,650.00 <br />15,0 <br />install 2 <br />Thunderbeams <br />to Replace <br />Current <br />Equipment $18,500.00 <br />After receiving the proposals staff checked all references <br />as to performance of equipment and contractor. All of the <br />references contacted provided positive recommendations <br />regarding the contractors. Also, those references having <br />bcth Thunderbolt and Thunderbeam sirens were clear in their <br />preference for the Thunderbeam as it required less <br />maintenance and was more vandal proof as it has no <br />equipment on the lower portion of the pole easily accessible <br />to vandals. <br />After developing this information and concluding the <br />Thunderbeam was more desireable, staff contacted the low <br />bidder, Corrigan Electric, to determine the cost for <br />installation of 1 Thunderheam with relocation of existing <br />equipment and see if the hid for I Thunderheams could he <br />reduced. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.