My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1986/06/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
Agenda Packets - 1986/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2025 4:03:22 PM
Creation date
3/31/2025 4:03:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/9/1986
Description
Regular Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds Vier PlAnninq Commission ,June 4, 191116 <br />R,•gnlAr Me,tinq Page Six <br />--------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Motion/Second: Porslund/Miller to approve Reso- <br />jut on No. 16i-R6. <br />ayes 1 AhslPntinn Motion carried <br />�:hAirman Mountie Abstained from the vote for previously <br />mentioned reasons. <br />Director Th•itclier reviewed his memn of May 27, 1986 9. DAryl RlAsbery, <br />to the planninq Commission, regArding the request of 8106 Groveland <br />;)aryl elnsberg to vACate An easement at 8106 Groveland ROAd, <br />Road. Case 191-86 <br />Ken Sjodin stated thAt there is a cloud on the title, <br />And requested the City take action stating that the <br />easement is no longer needed and remove it from the <br />property. <br />Director Thatcher stated that they would need positive <br />information from an attuuiey stating that them is a <br />definite easement on the property and Asking for it <br />to be. vacated. Ile explained that it is questionable <br />whether an easement still exists on the property, And <br />if it is removed, where it should go. <br />Mr. Sjodin stated that if an easement is required <br />somewhere, Mr. RlasbPrg does not own the other land <br />to grant another easement. <br />There was Cnnslueiauie- <br />easement actually exists and what action should be <br />taken. Director Thatcher stated he felt a legal <br />opinion was necessary. <br />Motion/Second: Mountin/Miller to table to the next <br />ageo,a session and request that this item be referred <br />to the City Attorney for his opinion, And further <br />request that the applicant or his representative <br />provide the P1Anninq Commission with letters from the <br />Attorneys who have searched the title on this. The <br />minutes should also he searched to the best of the <br />City's ability to see what happened to the easement. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />The Planning Commission Asked Director Thatcher to <br />investigate the title insurance And what guarantees <br />Are provided, to whom, and got back to them. <br />Chairman Mountin reviewed proposed Resolution No. <br />166-96. <br />Motion Carried <br />10. Discussion <br />Wuornos 6 A <br />Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.