Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City CouncilpD _ �� _ -___-_-__Five_-__-_ <br />August 25, 1586 !` F 0 <br />Regular Meeting <br />Page Five <br />j; <br />--� Director Thatcher replied that the developer has agreed <br />listed in the proposed <br />v <br />" <br />to many of the items that are now <br />agreement, but a development agreement was never done <br />for this development. <br />Director Thatcher stated he does not want a detention <br />was originally planned, and this <br />pond in the area, as <br />does meet Code for storm water detention. <br />proposal <br />Councilmember Hankner asked if that would fall into the <br />replied it <br />overall John Johnson plan. Director Thatcher <br />been determined how to pay <br />would, but it has not yet <br />for it. <br />Councilmember Haake stated she was concerned with putting <br />this development, <br />this cost onto the other residents for <br />to handle the storm water. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated they cannot stop the <br />property owner from developing. <br />Mayor Linke asked if the City was under the gun to push <br />"1 <br />this through.. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated that since the Council has <br />;I <br />not seen the development agreement until now, and <br />she would like <br />- there is much new information to review, <br />discussion over to the next agenda session. <br />to continue the <br />i4otion/Second: Linke/Hankner to place a prohabition of <br />this <br />any further building permits to be put forth on <br />is approved and a development <br />development until the plat <br />agreement entered into. <br />Motion Carried`' <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />It was the consensus of the Council to discuss this <br />further at the next agenda session. <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution <br />10. ofnResolution <br />esol <br />No. 2065, adopting the Economic Development Plan, and <br />No. <br />waive the reading. <br />Motion Carried <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed <br />sideration <br />11. ofnResolution <br />policy for park land use adjacent to residential <br />No. 2067 <br />nrooerty. <br />