Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS <br />OF PEpEBTRIAN ACTIVITY <br />were conducted during 1985' VerY few <br />Observations of pedestrian activity 8:00 <br />e Street during the mo[ning (7:00 to <br />school age Pedestrians crossed Le rinds. Pedestrian activity <br />A.M.) and afternoon (4:30 to 5:30 P.M.) Peak Pe <br />three multi -way stop sign controlled <br />e Street at any of the observed <br />across Le very light, pedestrians were <br />e Street was the area of controlled <br />intersections on � outside <br />Street at mid -block locations were observed. <br />crossing Lee pedestrians <br />tb conflicts with vehicles and P ably to <br />walks. destrians xe[e usually <br />ccosa so that Pe <br />were sufficiently Iw They did not walk to the <br />Traffic volumes cross Lee Stceet whenechose• <br />ver and whenever they rather <br />intersection to cross Lee <br />Street but <br />sign controlled more convenient to do so, <br />nearest stop apparently <br />crossed the street mid -block where it is <br />RESIDENT OPINION SURVEY <br />residents of the area to determine <br />was distributed to the raining the stop aL9^a on <br />An opinion survey removing or ce <br />.,,_ �o ightwcbood for remo _ ... <br />the Preference u`. were distributed to <br />Approximately 350 guestionna it es oared that each <br />I,ee Street. Engineering Division regL•- <br />The Traffic En9 he City - <br />fill <br />Street. id) and mail i[ to t <br />around Le stage Pa <br />out a survey Postcard (Po controlled <br />or all of the multi -way stop s'on household fill <br />The questionnaire asked if any <br />should not be removed. Comments were also solicits <br />intersections should or <br />regarding the residents preferences. <br />Analysis of the postcards returned showed the follwino° <br />1. Twenty six percent of the postcards were returned which w•s in keeping <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />0487T <br />