My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1989/08/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agenda Packets - 1989/08/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 11:07:50 AM
Creation date
4/23/2025 11:07:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/7/1989
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HEMORANDUM <br />Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members <br />From :Ric Minetor, <br />Director of Public Works/City <br />Date :July 31, 1989 /� ' Engineer <br />Subject :Bona - Edgewood Pathway _C _ <br />I have reviewed the condition of the fencing and <br />en <br />Bona Road and Edgewood Drive. The existing Pathway Width, with a chain 4 north <br />side <br />e do feet <br />cross -buck link fence along the north side and a wood <br />fence along the south side. The path needs <br />Parched and overlaid with bituminous surfacirt <br />along the south side to be <br />this iof <br />ssue is that the needs to be rebuilt. M g' and the fence <br />wood fence property owners on the south request understanding the <br />and agreed to maintain it. They now feel the fence is <br />beyond their ability to Trepair and desire the City to <br />I the fence. <br />intact, although weeds and tree he fence along the north side <br />wire mesh. seedlings are de is <br />growing through the <br />The easement for this <br />ces <br />are set back from the edge of the easemeIS 6 nt n width the fences varies from 6 the width dbetween nthe <br />bare minimum for maintenance le°hes to 7 feet 6 inches. <br />use certain a quipment and This is o <br />quipment on the makes it impossible y <br />files and can find no agreement Z have researched the responsibili.t g on who would have maintenance <br />there was a Y Employees in the Public Works department <br />verbal agreement regarding maintenance to be felt <br />responsibility of the adjacent property owners. With no written <br />agreement; and since the <br />probably retains maintenance cresponsibility. the fence <br />the city <br />We could attempt to repair the existing fence: u <br />condition is such that this will be costly. <br />If posts are cracked —we er, the <br />and should be replaced. Alternatively icant umber <br />could replace the fence with either chain link or a <br />cross -buck. The chain link fabric on the I we <br />also be replaced if n replace the similar wood <br />northerly fence should <br />southerly fence would allow southerly fence. Replacing between fences to allow maintenance Provide a uniform g the <br />This would require obtainingequipment access t from <br />width <br />property on the south side of heaPath. additional easements from path. <br />Path. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.