My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1988/03/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
Agenda Packets - 1988/03/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2025 11:43:09 AM
Creation date
6/16/2025 11:11:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/21/1988
Description
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds view City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />----------------------------------------------------- ---- <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley further explained the tax. <br />increment financing process. <br />Kathy Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, questioned whether any <br />money is received unless the project goes through, <br />and she stated she feels this puts a flag out to <br />developers, that the City is willing to have their <br />developments. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that financing is <br />nct received unless a project does go through. <br />Councilmember Hankner clarified that if development does <br />not occur within a given time, it becomes void and the <br />process must be started over again. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained Mr. Miller owns <br />77 acres, and he would only be able to develop 33 acres, <br />due to the wetlands. He added there is no DNR wetland <br />designation but rather a municipal designation. <br />Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the <br />regular meeting at 7:27 PM. <br />Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the <br />r,third public hearing at 7:27 PM. <br />0''Planner Herman presented an overhead map of the area in <br />question, stating that the proposal before the Council <br />at this time is to develop a tax increment plan for the <br />area. She reported that the Planning Commission had met <br />on February 17 and denied a resolution to approve the <br />consistency of the tax increment plan to the Comp Plan, <br />as they felt this was not a good plan for that area, and <br />they did not want a commercial plan there, and they did <br />not feel it was in keeping witi the Comp Plan, with the <br />spirit and intent in particular. <br />Councilmember Wuori added that the Planning Commission <br />had expressed concern with corporate welfare and subsi- <br />dizing businesses, and the possibility of the State <br />reversing itself on tax increment financing. <br />Mayor Linke stated the Planning Commission was to decide <br />if this was a viable project, and not the philosophical <br />aspects of it. <br />Planner Herman explained their denial was based on <br />inconsistency with the Comp Plan on the spirit and intent. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she is concerned over the <br />ka./business climate in the State and she feels it is very <br />much a local issue, and there are ways municipalities <br />can attract new businesses, with tax increment financing <br />being one. She added that everyone has a philosophical <br />view on that issue. <br />February 22, 198E <br />Page Three <br />9. Designation `4 <br />of Development <br />District No."2' <br />and Adoption.'. <br />of Development - <br />District Plan <br />and Developmen <br />Program <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.