CC PACKET 02091988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 Mr. Childs said he had determined the above was possible after a • 2 marathon meeting January 21st with the architect and the 3 contractor. During that meeting Fulco had agreed to reduce the 4 contract costs by $4 , 500 to cover the project delays and the extra 5 rent the City had to pay in the other location because of those 6 delays. The Manager said concessions were also negotiated with the 7 architect to cover plan errors, one of which was the installation of 8 the fire protection ceiling soffit which appeared as Item 5 in the 9 Contract Change Order before the Council that evening. He indicated 10 the City would be reimbursed $160 .00 by BWBR for overlooking that 11 item in the original plan and the architect .would have to pay part 12 of the $310. 00 it cost to return the doors to the factory to get 13 holes drilled for the mortise locks. 14 Mr. Childs recommended the Council approve the Change Order with the 15 understanding that another would be issued to cover the costs of the 16 door openers and closers as well as the extension of the project 17 completion date to January 29th (or the date that happens) . Some 18 retainage should also be expected to cover concrete work to be done 19 next spring. He also assured Councilmember Makowske the City had 20 gotten certification that all the subcontractors had been paid. 21 Council Action 22 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of Change 23 Order 04 for $550. 00 on the Stonehouse liquor warehouse addition. 24 Motion carried unanimously. • 25 April 12th Board of Review Scheduled 26 Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to schedule the St. Anthony 27 Board of Review to be held at 6 : 30 P.M. prior to the regularly 28 scheduled Council meeting, April 12, 1988. 29 Motion carried unanimously. 30 February 23rd Precinct Caucuses Cause Rescheduling of Last February 31 Council Meeting 32 Mr. Childs had included copies of the notice regarding the precinct 33 caucuses in the Council' s agenda packets and pointed out that the 34 Council meeting scheduled for the same evening would include not 35 only the report on the February 16th Planning Commission meeting but 36 also what could be a very detailed report on the community survey 37 taken in December. He said he understood the latter might be 38 especially interesting because the surveyors had already reported 39 finding St. Anthony residents with "varied but very strong 40 opinions" on many of the issues the survey covered. 41 Council Action • 6