My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 07212001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 07212001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:38:58 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:38:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 07212001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> June 26, 2001 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 1 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 2 XI. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND STAFF. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 A. Planning Commission –June 19, 2001. <br /> 5 1. Subdi.vision request for 2816 Highway 88. (Resolution 01-069) <br /> 6 Commissioner Thomas stated that Mr. Palkowski was present, and that his request was <br /> 7 routine. Therefore, Commissioner Thomas recommended that the Council approve his <br /> 8 subdivision request. <br /> 9 Mayor Cavanaugh asked why this needed to be done. Mr. Palkowski stated he wanted it <br /> 10 to be treated as one lot going forward. <br /> 11 Motion by Commissioner Sparks to adopt Resolution 01-069 re: Sub-division request <br /> 12 for 2816 Highway 88. <br /> 13 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 14 2. Ordinance 2001-2002, re: Electronic signs (1S1 reading). <br /> 15 Commissioner Thomas informed the Council that the discussion among the Planning <br /> 16 Commissioners was a very contentious issue, as they wanted to be proactive with an <br /> 17 electronic sign ordinance. <br /> 18 Commissioner Thomas said it was a question of whether to write the ordinance exactly <br /> 19 how they want it, line by line, or to hash out the details with the City Council's input and <br /> 20 the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the sub-committee. <br /> 21 Commissioner Thomas stated that they wanted to essentially deal with the policy issue. <br /> 22 He added that most Commissioners agreed that the ordinance should be changed first, <br /> 23 with the specifics to come later. <br /> 24 Commissioner Thomas stated that they were recommending a hybrid ordinance, and that, <br /> 25 if the City decides to go forward with an electronic sign, they would need to go back to <br /> 26 the Planning Commission to determine the aesthetic issues. He added that it was a split <br /> 27 Commission, and most felt uncomfortable without seeing the specifics of the ordinance. <br /> 28 Commissioner Thomas stated that they were willing to work with the Council to develop <br /> 29 the final product. <br /> 30 Councilmember Thuesen asked Mr. Gilligan if he had an opinion on the issue. Mr. <br /> 31 Gilligan stated that he did not. He added that he thought it could be best used with the <br /> 32 conditional use process. <br /> 33 Commissioner Thomas stated that they were feeling they could move forward with the <br /> 34 proposal with an electronic sign. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.