Laserfiche WebLink
23 <br /> For a decade or more NMMA has called for the State to develop a statewide economic <br /> development and redevelopment policy along with appropriate tools and funding. Few have <br /> accepted this challenge to take a leadership role and become proactive in terms of the <br /> development of new tools, programs and policies that will place the State of Minnesota in the <br /> forefront of competition for economic growth. <br /> The newly created TIF Grant Fund administered by the Department of Revenue is set up to <br /> address debt service only. Pay-as-you-go notes, interfund loans and others will not be eligible <br /> for relief from this fund. There is some ability to pool, but only if all other pre-e)asting obligations <br /> are satisfied. To gain access to the fund, several things must occur: <br /> • A city must have debt that meets the deadlines set forth in statute; <br /> • A city must have pooled all available increment; <br /> • A city must let the certified tax rate float and change the fiscal disparities election. <br /> Few cities, if any, will access the fund. If this is the case and the money is unspent, there is an <br /> opportunity to reposition these resources so that they could be allocated to a statewide <br /> development and redevelopment program(s). <br /> Objective <br /> Create new statewide economic development and redevelopment tools designed to give the <br /> State and local communities the necessary tools and funding support to address development <br /> and redevelopment opportunities. <br /> There is a need to bring together proponents willing to provide the necessary leadership.to <br /> advance this proposal. The current system suffers greatly because it seems that key legislators <br /> no longer have confidence in it. Even the public at large is showing signs of non-acceptance, <br /> (e.g., the negative reaction of groups in the city of Minneapolis regarding the use of TIF for <br /> various projects). What role should the State, the region, and the local communities play in this <br /> arena? What kinds of programs, policies and support are in fact legitimate to pursue, and what <br /> outcomes are desired that can be measured against the investments made? These and other <br /> policy driven questions need to be openly discussed, probed and dealt with in unison with other <br /> interested organizations and decision-makers. <br /> This is an area where NMMA can play a role to bring decision-makers, the community at large, <br /> and other interested parties to the table to discuss options and probe alternatives that are <br /> working in other parts of the country, and engage public discussion on the subject. <br /> Action Steps <br /> 1. Clearly identify and articulate the need to create new development and redevelopment tools. <br /> Work with key legislators, Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development, Minnesota <br /> State Planning, Metropolitan Council and other governmental units, (e.g., counties and <br /> school districts and others), other interested groups and organizations -to design a new set <br /> of development and redevelopment tools that would be funded at the State level and that <br /> could be used by local units of government statewide. Coordinate with key legislative <br /> leadership, administrative officials and schedule initial legislative committee hearings. <br /> 2. Attempt to create statewide funding mechanism for the current economic development <br /> program that will produce a minimum of$100,000,000 annually. The fund would be <br /> managed by the Department of Trade and Economic Development, State Planning <br /> 4 <br />