My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01252000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000
>
CC PACKET 01252000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:11:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:11:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 01252000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> January 11, 2000 <br /> . Page 7 <br /> 1 Mornson reminded the Council that the homes needed to be removed by the spring. <br /> 2 In regard to the Harding Street Project (item no. 6 in the January 6 letter), Mr. Hubmer stated that <br /> 3 the construction would be intrusive for the residents in their backyards. In this respect, the <br /> 4 landscape architect had met with the residents to arrive at options and ideas to ensure that the <br /> 5 project is satisfactory to the residents. Consequently, Mr. Hubmer requested that the Council <br /> 6 give consideration to increasing the original preliminary design phase estimate of$19,500 to <br /> 7 $29,500. The increase of funding would assist with the preliminary design phase and would cre- <br /> 8 ate more options for the residents and landscaping. <br /> 4 <br /> 9 Additionally, at this time, Mr. Hubmer requested that the Council give consideration to obtaining <br /> 10 appraisals of the property. Several residents have requested that the City provide an estimate as <br /> 11 to the compensation which may be expected through easement acquisition or fee title ownership <br /> 12 of their property. <br /> 13 In this respect, Mr. Hubmer presented two estimates that had been obtained based on the ease- <br /> 14 ment acquisition scenario. In essence, appraisals would be done for each individual property <br /> 15 which is affected by the project. It is WSB's anticipation that the estimates for appraisals could <br /> �6 be presented to the individuals prior to or at the next public hearing, which is preliminarily <br /> 7 scheduled for February 29, 2000. <br /> 18 Sparks inquired about the urgency of the appraisals. Mr. Hubmer responded that, to date, he had <br /> 19 already received three requests from residents to promptly proceed with the appraisals. <br /> 20 Mornson offered that the appraisals would assist in beginning negotiations and placing a value <br /> 21 on the easements. In other words, the City considered it necessary to have an outside consultant <br /> 22 and negotiator identify fair options. Mr. Hubmer added that the appraisal is a starting point in <br /> 23 providing additional information to the residents about the total impact of the project. <br /> 24 Horst requested clarification of the increase in funding for the preliminary design phase. Mr. <br /> 25 Hubmer responded that the added funds would allow for the landscape architect to provide op- <br /> 26 tions and alternatives to the residents. <br /> 27 Mr. Hubmer directed the Council's attention to a letter dated October 28, 1999 from Close Land- <br /> 28 scape Architecture in which an outline for the proposed project as it related to landscaping was <br /> 29 set forth. <br /> 30 The letter stated, in short, that there are four tasks anticipated. <br /> 31 1. Task One: Project Start Up, Research and Visioning (completed). <br /> 2 2. Task Two: Preliminary Design. <br /> 3 3. Task Three: Preferred Plan <br /> 34 4. Task Four: Final Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.