My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01231990
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990
>
CC PACKET 01231990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:04:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:03:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 01231990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Meeting <br /> January 9, 1990 <br /> page 5 <br /> • <br /> 1 signs were more advertising than directional and this is inappropriate. <br /> 2 Also, removal of the Autumn Woods logo on signs #/2 and #/4 was requested <br /> 3 by the- Planning Commission to reduce sign size. Commissioner Wagner felt <br /> 4 that too much signage was originally requested for the size of the complex. <br /> 5 He was satisfied that the compromise recommendation addressed this <br /> 6 concern. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Paul Brewer, representing LaNel Financial , advised the Council that the <br /> 9 amended signage request was what the developer felt was essential for <br /> 10 effective signage. He stated that they make their own signs which lends <br /> 11 an uniform appearance. He showed photos to the Council of the signage at <br /> 12 two other LaNel developments, Twin Lake North and Broadway Village. Brewer <br /> 13 was of the opinion the signage at these two developments reflected a <br /> 14 "professional package" image. He also noted the necessity of the sign <br /> 15 near the entrance adjacent to the Walker Building. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Councilmember Enrooth felt signs #/2 and .#4 were clearly more directional <br /> 18 rather than advertising. Councilmember Marks agreed and suggested that <br /> 19 differences in sign size may be confusing to motorists seeking a specific <br /> 20 building within the complex. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Discussion continued regarding each sign size and the use of the logo. <br /> • 23 Councilmember Enrooth suggested the use of the Autumn Woods "branches" <br /> 24 would lend continuity to all of the signs and was very attractive. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to. approve the sign variance request <br /> �7 of LaNel Financial for Autumn .Woods Apartments with the following restric- <br /> 28 tions; sign #/1 will be a maximum of 15 square feet, with the same restric- <br /> �9 tion for sign ##2 and sign #/3; and sign ##4 will be no more than 51 square <br /> 30 feet and that the logo will be allowed. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Roll call : Marks, Enrooth, Ranallo - aye Makowske - abstain <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Motion by Ranallo, second by Marks to grant a variance to LaNel Financial <br /> 35 for Autumn Woods Apartments for three "Now Renting" banner signs to be <br /> 36 removed by December 1 , 1990, and that all temporary Autumn 'Woods signage <br /> 37 be removed by May 1 , 1990• <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Roll call : Marks, Enrooth, Ranallo - aye Makowske - abstain <br /> 40 <br /> 41 <br /> w 42 2. Setback Variance Request from Nedegaard Construction for Evergreen <br /> i� <br /> 43 Townhomes <br /> _ 44 <br /> 45 It was noted that this variance request is due to an innocent error made <br /> 46 by the developer, Nedegaard Construction. The townhome project had been <br /> 47 undertaken by Nedegaard Construction from another developer. Granting of <br /> 48 the variances being requested was recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> 49 <br /> The error was brought to the attention of the City staff by Nedegaard <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.