Laserfiche WebLink
• Site Analysis: <br /> Following the Space Needs Report,a limited site analysis was performed for potentially <br /> available sites(including the existing site)within the City. A matrix (see below)was <br /> created to compare certain objective and subjective criteria for each potential site. Each <br /> criteria was then discussed and a score assigned to each site. Ultimately,the location of <br /> the Fire Station would need to be decided by a process of open dialogue among the City's <br /> leaders,but for the purposes of this study,the site receiving the most points(54)is <br /> Kenzie Terrace(Site#2). <br /> • It should be noted that if the Fire Station remains at or near its current location on the <br /> south end of the city,the existing Fire Department Sub-Station has to remain at the <br /> Public Works site. Likewise,if the Fire Station is relocated to a site on the north end <br /> of the city,a Sub-Station is needed on the south end of the city. A site located near <br /> ' the geographic center of the city would eliminate the need for a Sub-Station. <br /> Fire Station#1 —Site Review <br /> VV�i O O 0 <br /> Site Ranking Criteria c = L <br /> � o� <br /> 3—lowest 4; -- <br /> 6—o.k. ,� y r� N u en � � � � � to M� <br /> is M N CQ 2 * oo * x 'n <br /> 9—best W :. W as as ^ a� 3 a� W to <br /> r C N — C ~ � ~ M •~ <br /> Accessibility for citizens— 9 6 3 ** 9 <br /> connection with community <br /> Accessibility to City for 6 6 6 ** 9 <br /> emergency <br /> Safety(street traffic/apparatus 6 6 3 ** 3 <br /> intersection) <br /> Compatibility with neighboring 9 9 9 ** 3 <br /> uses—opposition factor <br /> Potential for better use of site 3 9 3 ** 3 <br /> Cost to acquire 9 9 9 ** 3 <br /> Site development(cost) 6 9 6 ** 6 <br /> Soils/water table * * * ** <br /> Municipal water/sanitary/storm * * * ** <br /> Electrical utility* * * ** <br /> Gas utility* * * ** <br /> ' Zoning * * * ** <br /> Other EAW issues * * * ** <br /> Street Development * * * ** <br /> Assessments * * * ** <br /> Total Score: 48 54 39 ** 36 <br /> * This criteria is considered to be equal for all evaluated sites. Though this criteria will not affect the <br /> outcome of the rankings,they have been included here to demonstrate the scope of the Site Review. <br /> ** Site#4,New Market Site, is considered indeterminable for the purposes of this Review due to a `Best <br /> Use' Planning Study concurrently being performed by the City. <br /> 10 <br />