PL PACKET 01201987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- Jhe hear.ing opened at 7:36 P.M. by Acting Chair Hansen.... 2 3 Notice of the heari-ng had been published in the November 4th Bulletin and mailed 4 to all property owners of record within 350 feet of. the subject property. No 5 one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its content. 6 7 Application: to split off a 20 X 120 foot parcel from the rear of Mr. , Hertog' s 8 residence and attach it to the Edward Street 50 X 180 foot 9 ' lot. The result would be two lots, 14,400 and 11 ,400 square 10 feet, both of which would be aboVe minimum size. 12 Proponents: John Hertog, owner of both properties who said lot split would 13 create a More buildable parcel on Edward Street. 14 15 Opponents: none and Mr. Childs said none of the numerous property owners 16 who had been notified of the request had called him before 17 the hearing. 18 19 Staff input: recommend approval because no variance would be required and 20 resultant lots would both comply with Zoning Ordinance; 21 22 agreed that removing the existing small house on Edward .would 23 make that property more marketable. 24� 25 The hearing was clos.ed. at 7:45 P.M. 26 27 Commission' Recommends Lot Split- Approval S' 29� ' Motion by Bowerman, econded by Were'nicz to recommend -the Council grant 30 the request from John L. Hertog, _ 2521 St. Anthony, Road for subdivi.sion without 31 platting. This would allow the applicant to split a parcel 20 --feet X 120-. 32. feet from the north side of .Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Clark and Kings Henn6pin 33 Gardens (2521 St. Anthony Road) to be attached to Lot 4, Block 2, Clark... .. and. Kings Gardens (3246 E-dward Street) for the purposes of constructing home 'on 'the thUs' enlarged lot ait'3246 Edward: Street,— 35 a new sin4fe faimfly 36 and rerfioving the structure currently on said lot. 37 38 In recommend approval , the Commission finds that: 39 40 * the request Appears ,to be in order; 41 * no one appeared to speak against the proposal -at the Commission hearing 42 and staff had reported receiving no calls for or against the request prior 43 to the hearing; 44 45-1 by allowing the lot split, the City would be- cre'ating two lots bothiof 46 of which would meet minimum standards for l6tsizes in St. Anthony. 47 48 Motion carried unanimously, 49 50 OTHER BUSINESS 51 52� FINAL-. PLAT REVIEW OF VILLAGE TOWNHOMES IN ST. ANTHONY 53 54 Staff input: said platting was for remaining 23 units in the subdivision which 55 are all under construction;