My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03202001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 03202001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:40:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:40:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 03202001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> January 29, 2001 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Mr. Hartman asked about the bathroom by the tennis court. Ms. Olivier asked how much space <br /> 2 they want to take for that bathroom and if a unisex handicapped restroom and drinking fountain <br /> 3 is an option. . <br /> 4 Jindra stated the park already has drinking fountains so another is not needed in that location. <br /> 5 Ms. Olivier stated it is 100 square feet and with a cost of$150 per square foot, it would cost <br /> 6 $15,000 for one unisex bathroom. <br /> 7 Ms. Olivier stated she does not have the actual materials "nailed down" but they will do a full <br /> 8 blown cost estimate as soon as the floor plan and materials are finalized. <br /> 9 Jindra asked about the position of the pavilion coming closer to the fields. Ms. Olivier stated that <br /> 10 would be better addressed by Mr. Kost. <br /> 11 Mr. Kost stated that issue has not yet been addressed since the Commission had not indicated <br /> 12 whether they supported consolidating the shelters. He noted the patio space for the eight <br /> 13 additional picnic tables and suggested the shape and materials be further addressed to assure it <br /> 14 works well with the play areas. <br /> 15 Jensen noted the cost estimate is quite high. Zurbey agreed and noted the cost estimate does not <br /> 16 include demolition. <br /> 17 Zurbey asked if this can be considered in phases. Mr. Kost estimated that an additional $400,000 <br /> 18 would be needed. <br /> 19 Mr. Hartman noted this project has gone from a refurbished structure to new construction. <br /> 20 Jindra questioned the cost estimate of$15,000 for the bathroom. Mr. Kost agreed that bathrooms <br /> 21 cannot be estimated based on square footage. <br /> 22 Jindra stated it was agreed to consolidate to one pavilion with a concession stand. <br /> 23 Zurbey stated he does not want this project to be further delayed because an additional $400,000 <br /> 24 is needed. He stated he likes the concept but would prefer to consider it as a Phase II project. <br /> 25 Mr. Kost asked the Commission to first determine if there will be one building or two buildings. <br /> 26 The Commission should then determine how large the one building would need to be and dollar <br /> 27 threshold. Direction can then be given to the architect on the number of buildings and dollar <br /> 28 amount available. At that point, the architect can design a facility to fit that direction. <br /> 029 Mr. Kost suggested that the subcommittee meet again with Ms. Olivier to inform her of that <br /> 30 information and address types of building finishes she should include. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.