CC PACKET 06281983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• - 5 - be served incidentally, Mr. Slick said, since he is not interested in providing meal service. He said he would have no objections to having his permit reviewed in a years time because his operation would- be owner controlled and he intends to see to it that the establishment doesn't become a nuisance for the neighbors who live so close to the shopping center. He - told Jerry Kelly, 2809 Pahl Avenue, who is a merchant in the adjoining center that he wouldn' t tolerate the disturbances in his parking lot. The hearing was closed at 9:03 p.m. Commissioner Bowerman indicated he was concerned that telling Mr. Slick-his operation would be revi-ewed' in one year might restrict Mr. Slick in his investments and from conducting his business in an orderly fashion— .Commissioner Franzese -agreed a review did not seem necessary since the ordinance already provided a means of handling noise and nuisance transgressions. Commissioner Jones indicated he believed the review stipulation would provide control the City needs to prevent the neighbors being disturbed by music coming out an opened back door. Motion by Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones to recommend the Council grant a . conditional use permit to Robert Slick for the operation of a non-alcoholic bar "The Alternative" , as proposed, at 2523 Harding Street N.E . , finding that this would • appear to be an acceptable use in a commercial district; adequate parking a:fid_acc`ess would be provided in' that location, and that there would be sufficient distance between the- facility and the adjoining residential neighborhood, but setting the following conditions for approval; 1. No more than two pool tables , which are not coin operated, would be allowed. 2. Only modest amounts. of "snack type food would be served. 3. T-he establishment would be open to the public and not become a private club.. 4. Noise levels would not be a nuisance. The following friendly ammendment by Commisioner Bowerman was accepted: The- Commission further stipulates that the conditional use permit .should be reviewed by - the City in one year and in the event the Council elects to not continue the permit, the burden of responsi- bility. should be on the Council to produce sufficient reason for not continuing the permit and .not on the proprietor for justifying the continuance • Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was recessed from -9 :25 p.m. until 9 : 30 p.m. when the public hearing to consider the 'request for the necessary. rezoning, conditional use permit and variances to•. allow the. expansion from