Laserfiche WebLink
31 <br /> Crystal Does not have a FAR standard; 30%rear yard structure coverage <br /> which means no more than 30% of the rear yard may be covered <br /> by accessory structures, including: sheds, detached garages, <br /> patios, sidewalks, porches, decks and landings, driveways, <br /> swimming pools, and accessory parking spaces. The total square <br /> footage of all accessory structures may not exceed the main floor <br /> square footage of the principal residential structure. They have a <br /> development review committee, although"committee"means a <br /> range of city staffers which meets when a conditional use permit <br /> or site plan request warrants a meeting. The discussions at the <br /> meeting form a basis for the staff recommendation to the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> Golden Valley Does not have a floor area ratio or lot coverage/maximum <br /> impervious surface requirement in the residential zoning districts. <br /> Houses and accessory buildings only have to meet the standard <br /> setback requirements. Have discussed adding this requirement. <br /> There is a mix of feelings on this issue. Generally, the City likes to <br /> encourage people to add to their homes and stay in Golden Valley <br /> but there are some that complain there is too much home on some <br /> small lots. Although not in the zoning code, total garage space <br /> (detached and attached) is 1000 sq. ft. They do not have a design <br /> review board; however, they have a Building Board of Review. <br /> The BBR is advisory to the Building Official and has no "official' <br /> duties, other than to review and approve landscape plans. <br /> Shoreview Looked at using a FAR standard a few years ago on residential lots <br /> that didn't meet our area or dimension requirements for lakefront <br /> properties. These lots were pretty narrow and the small old lake <br /> cabins were getting replaced with much larger homes that seemed <br /> to dwarf the surrounding properties. Had a lot of discussion about <br /> how to measure floor area, decided that although the concept was <br /> a good one, implementation and enforcement was going to be very <br /> difficult. Ended up trying to control mass through a combination <br /> of setbacks (to define the buildable area), lot coverage (all <br /> impervious surfaces), foundation area restrictions (building area) <br /> and a strict height standard. Lot coverage is restricted to 25% of <br /> the lot size, foundation area to 18%of the lot size and height to 28 <br /> feet from high point to low point. Foundation area includes all <br /> roofed structures (including covered porches or decks since they <br /> contribute to the visual mass) except for detached accessory <br /> structures less than 150 sf. These standards have been effective at <br /> controlling building mass. The height standard has probably been <br /> the most effective. The Planning Commission conducts what they <br /> call "residential design review."It is not a subjective process; once <br /> the applicant demonstrates they meet standards,they are a roved. <br />