My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 12171996
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1996
>
PL PACKET 12171996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:33:16 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:33:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1996
SP Name
PL PACKET 12171996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8) On page 15, section 4.4 part 3 states the city request <br /> bidder's to provide information and prices for optional equipment. <br /> Part 3 request prices and information on check verification. Total <br /> Reg.ister Systems did -not provide information and. price for check <br /> verification, therefore the bid should be rejected. <br /> Part 4 asks for information and prices on Surveillance System <br /> integration. Retail Data Systems identifies in their bid that it is <br /> not available at this time. Total Register Systems does not address <br /> the option at all. <br /> 9) on page 17, section 5.3 states "The bidder shall provide a <br /> quotation for the first year' s maintenance to comply with the <br /> following specifications. A separate, annual quotation is requested <br /> for extending this service for the next two years" . Total Register <br /> Systems does not provide the cost for service for one year, nor <br /> does it provide a separate, annual quotation for extended service <br /> for the next two years. Total Register Systems bid should be <br /> rejected for failure to provide these required quotations. <br /> Section 5.3.1, part I states "The vendor will be responsible for <br /> providing maintenance services for all of the inventory control <br /> system specific equipment and software and hardware obtained from <br /> this ' bid" . Total Register Systems states on the page titled <br /> Maintenance and Support, they - will maintain and support- all <br /> hardware and software purchased from them for one year from the <br /> delivery date to the store. This section of their bid continues by <br /> stating that they will act as the single point of contact when the <br /> stores experience problems, diagnose the nature of the problem, and <br /> respond as the service agent or contact Ameridata. I am confused as <br /> to how Ameridata participates in the purchase of this equipment, <br /> and to what role they play as our service agent. The RFB <br /> specifically states that the vendor is responsible for the entire <br /> system. Total Register Systems bid should be rejected because they <br /> are including another company to provide some level of service to <br /> us, which is not allowed by specification. <br /> 10) On page 19, section 6.2 part 3 states "No bid will be received <br /> if. it is detached from the package in which it is bound; nor must , <br /> any of the accompanying papers be detached therefrom, but the <br /> entire package must be unbroken and unaltered, in good order, and <br /> enclosed in a sealed envelop when the bid is deposited. Total <br /> Register systems deposited their bid in a cardboard box, taped <br /> shut, containing sales brochures which had the bid papers unbound <br /> and placed inside the sales brochures. I have included the bid as <br /> it was received by me, for you to view. This may seem to be a petty <br /> issue, but it does demonstrate yet another way that this bid fails <br /> to meet the requirements and specifications setf orth in the Request <br /> for Bids. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.