Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> I Motion by Marks; seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $4,741 .75 <br /> 2 to the Briggs and Morgan law firm for legal services related to St. • <br /> 3 Anthony's water contamination litigation settlement negotiations with <br /> 4 the U.S. Army during January, 1989. A $3,746.50 credit had been allowed <br /> 5 by the law firm in accordance with the agreement they had with the City <br /> 6 to limit their fees for these settlement negotiations to $17,500.00. <br /> 7 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 8 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $19 ,627.86 <br /> 9 to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for March sewer services. <br /> 10 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> it Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve the last payment of <br /> 12 $12,000.00 due School District #282 for use of Parkview from July <br /> 13 through October, 1988 after which time the City acquired ownership of <br /> 14 the building. <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 REPORTS <br /> 17 COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> 18 Mayor's Proclamation Honoring City Volunteers Delayed Until After Easter <br /> 19 Mayor Sundland indicated his intent to make the above proclamation • <br /> 20 rather than the one in the Council's agenda packet, as indicated in the <br /> 21 following: <br /> 22 Motion by Marks, seconded by Sundland to schedule a proclamation <br /> 23 honoring volunteerism in St. Anthony sometime after March 26, 1989. <br /> 24 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 25 Council to Hear About Proposed Group Home Legislation at Future Meeting <br /> 26 Councilmember Makowske reported learning a good deal about the proposed <br /> 27 changes in regulation and location of group homes during the meeting of <br /> 28 the Ramsey County League of Local Governments held at Maplewood City <br /> 29 Hall, February 15th. She indicated she had been requested to ascertain <br /> 30 the City Council's interest in having someone come to a future Council <br /> 31 meeting to address the issues related to the disbursement of these <br /> 32 facilities into residential neighborhoods rather than clustering such <br /> 33 facilities around the centers which provide immediate care for various <br /> 34 types of group home residents. The Councilmember indicated such <br /> 35 facilities are now county administered but state supervised with <br /> 36 approximately 48% of the funding coming from the federal government, 37% <br /> 37 from the state and 15% local or county. <br /> 4 • <br />