My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01281992
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1992
>
CC PACKET 01281992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:14:50 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 01281992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Larry Hamer January 20, 1992 Page 2 • <br /> ' I <br /> D.D.C. Contractors <br /> This contractor was non-responsive in his proposal for grouting because he <br /> merely provided labor and equipment costs. Reviewing these numbers it is clear <br /> that costs from this contractor would greatly exceed those proposed by the <br /> previous contractor. <br /> A price of $88 ($102 with Jedlicki's fee) per square foot was proposed for <br /> concrete repair. <br /> J.T. Trout Corporation <br /> With 15% Contractor Fee <br /> Grouting for 3 cubic yards $4,205 $4,835 <br /> Grouting for 5 cubic yards $5,825 $6,699 <br /> Concrete repair would be $45 per square foot ($52 with fee) ; with a minimum <br /> of 160 s.f. of concrete repair the cost would be $8,280. The proposal indicated <br /> these prices are good only if both the grouting and concrete repair are to be <br /> performed. The estimated cost for doing eight sections of pipe would be $14,979. <br /> In addition to repair, replacement and reconstruction might be considered. • <br /> The pipe could be demolished and replaced with new round pipe. This alternative <br /> would cost about $140 per lineal foot or $7,000 for eight sections. The existing <br /> arch pipe could be removed, the void filled, and the arch pipe replaced with a <br /> bitumastic sealant in the joints for about $60 per lineal foot or $3,600 for <br /> eight sections of pipe. <br /> The three best alternatives appear to be repair by grouting only, <br /> replacement with new pipe, or reconstruction using the existing RCPA. The <br /> grouting option would effectively deal with any foundation weakness that remains, <br /> but there is an inherent risk of cost overrun and does not solve surface spalling <br /> problems. Replacement with new round pipe is the lowest risk option and solves <br /> any problems with surface spalling. Reconstruction of the existing RCPA is the <br /> lowest cost alternative, but does not address the spalling problem and there is <br /> a risk some sections may break and require replacement with new pipe. <br /> I recommend the installation of new round pipe, but not necessarily right <br /> now. Precast concrete usually shows signs of distress before total failure.. <br /> Since the foundation of the pipe appears to be adequate, although not perfect, <br /> I recommend that the pipe be monitored for structural failure or foundation <br /> problems. when the spalling can no longer be tolerated or the foundation shows <br /> signs of imminent failure, then the pipe can be replaced. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Dana R. Gauthie <br /> DRG/kmh <br /> 23\27\522\LH.LTR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.