My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 01151985
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1985
>
PL MINUTES 01151985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:00:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:00:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
PL MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1985
SP Name
PL MINUTES 01151985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6- <br /> 1 to be a story and a half in the rear in deference to the neighbors who would view <br /> 2 them from the rear. The "prairie" style home had been adopted for the townhomes <br /> 3 because, Mr. Carlsen said, Brighton Development perceived that style .would be more <br /> 4 in keeping with the surrounding homes. At the suggestion of the community at the <br /> 5 December 29th meeting, the architect told the Commissioners. the developers are <br /> 6 evaluating the possibility of providing two car garages for some of the units. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Commissioner Jones said he had a real problem with the problem for potential buyers <br /> 9 with the first phase of units being-constructed so they backed up on the busy <br /> 10 intersection of Old Highway 8. The- Manager. and architects both indicated that <br /> 11 was the only possible way the buildings could be constructed as far away as <br /> 12 possible from the neighbors to' the west. Ms' :.- Frank told the Commissioner there <br /> 13 might be a conflict with the existing drainage ditch if the driveways and parking <br /> 14 for those townhouses were built in the Old Highway 8 right-of=way. Mr. Carlsen <br /> 15 told Commissioner Jones that although neither one of them might like to have their <br /> 16 rear yards facing the. street, the developer feels that there is a market for <br /> 17 persons who want that specific design, .i .e.,, people who like to watch the action <br /> 18 from that vantage point. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Commissioner Madden gave the perspective of a townhouse dweller, disputing the <br /> 21 impression that some single family residents have that people who live in townhomes <br /> 22 are any different than themselves.. He agreed with Commissioner Jones that the <br /> 23 potential for the noise and congestion in the back yards facing Old Highway 8 might <br /> 24 be a detriment to selling those units. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Virgil Hietala, 3609 - 33rd Avenue N.E. , who lives across 33rd Avenue from the <br /> 27 proposed project', indicated that although he would have always preferred to have <br /> 28 single family homes' across from his-.home, had become convinced that the project <br /> 2.9 proposed now was the' best..which could be- expected for that property which .is a <br /> 30 difficult shape to develop. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Bob Williams,' who said he lives just south .of the project at 3125 Croft Drive, <br /> 33 whose back yard runs along Old Highway 8; said he is generally in favor of the <br /> 34 proposed project, "mainly to get rid of what 's there now". However, Mr. Williams <br /> 35 added- that he had mixed feelings- ab,out the proposal because of his concern about <br /> 36 what could happen if the property is rezoned and the proposed development falls <br /> 37 through. Mr. Childs told him that if Brighton doesn 't develop the site, the H.R.A. <br /> 38 would .have already purchased the parcel and would accept only a development for it <br /> 39 which would be done properly. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Gail Gibson, who said she and her husband had bought the property at 3612 - 33rd <br /> 42 Avenue N.E. , immediately west of. the Walbon property in September, . said she believes <br /> 43 they- are the only neighbors who have 50% of their property abutting the subject <br /> 44 property. She wanted assurance that the property line in front of her *home would <br /> 45 be straightened out before the final project plans are. adopted. Mr. Childs reported <br /> 46 that,this -had been done. She added that survey sticks recently put in would seem <br /> 47 to indicate that would be the case. Mrs. Gibson stated, of course she and her <br /> 48 husband would prefer single family residences with fewer people next -door to them, <br /> 49 especially since the side of their home is only 26feet from the Walbon property <br /> 50 line, but said she had perceived from the December 29th meeting that the proposed <br /> 51 developers-would be "reasonable people, who would give weight to the neighbor's. <br /> 52 wishes that the development would be sited as far away from the neighbors ' homes. <br /> S53 to the west as possible." She also indicated she hoped the project would not <br /> 54 cause any water drainage problems for her home. When pressed by Commissioner Jones <br /> 55 to say .she perceived the proposed project would "have a positive advantage over the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.